it's only rock and roll
ay yay yay yay yay..............
after all the time, drugs, sex, booze, deaths, money.............and the music of course.
it comes down to cock and dancing girls?
well, i actually kinda understand in my own little way. the singer's insecure and the guitar player wants credibility. don't they fucking all............it's great that the stones make it a public display more than anything else. entertainment = entertain!!!!
"Entertainment is an amusement or diversion intended to hold the attention of an audience or its participants."
i actually symphasize with the spokesperson. go home and get a stiff drink.
--------------------------------------------
* Last week, Keith Richards made a public apology to Mick Jagger for saying his lead singer has a "small cock".
Now he has raised the ire of a group of dancing girls, hired by the Rolling Stones' tour organisers to decorate the stage behind the band, after he refused to play in Boston if they were used.
"Organisers hired 25 gorgeous professional female dancers, outfitted them with costumes and paid for their transport," says a source. "But Keith didn't like the idea of sharing the stage with the beautiful young things."
According to the New York Daily News, Richards, far left, threw a "hissy fit" and said "no girls, or no show", so the dance troupe was dispatched to New York, by bus.
All this will do little to patch up differences between Jagger and Richards. Jagger had just congratulated the dancers on their dress rehearsal, and would undoubtedly have frowned at the thought of squandering the $100,000 that the whole thing cost.
An official spokesman says: "Every tour they try ideas, and make decisions on what works."