" /> oh, go for it then: September 2007 Archives

« August 2007 | Main | October 2007 »

September 27, 2007

another interesting read to ponder about with some tea and soggy biscuits

there's lots of nuance and hints in the article, i felt. or is it just me?
whatever the case (or my sanity), as these virtual worlds bring the world seemingly "closer", there will be more consideration necessary to accomodate differences in perception. i am going to go away and think now.

article link

" TOKYO -

Orderly, pornography-free and safe for children, "meet-me," an online interactive virtual Tokyo, is Japan's answer to "Second Life." Or so its creators hope.

Kunimasa Hamaoka, who oversees "meet-me" at digital marketing company Transcosmos Inc., is banking on the cultural differences between Japanese and Americans to compete against the world's top virtual community.

Japanese are so well-behaved and conformist, he says, they would prefer a more predictable and secure virtual environment over the free-spirited anything-goes of "Second Life," created by San Francisco-based Linden Lab."

September 26, 2007

percolated albini

steve albini i think has helped many musicians in one way or another, whether you like him or not.

his most "known" contribution to wayne's world has been the (in)famous article first published on maximum rock and roll, 1994 i think it was. according to the wiki, i was wrong, it was 1993 and the mrr publication is a reprint. wiki iz information nazi. i read the mrr article back then and it has inspired me a lot. the system has changed a bit now, and the budgets a lot, but still worth a read. if you don't understand what he's saying, i recommend you study, since it is useful.

what i'm trying to say is that beyond the core element that is yourself and your band, anybody or anything beyond that, in core principle, all that they can do is help amplify your ideas and music.

of course, they can mix their own ego and convenience and really fuck it up for you as well (aka, a lot of "managers", "agents" and "a&r" people "hey i got that radio interview for you, it's live at 5am!!!!"). they may not be ill willed (but often ignorant), but still be harmful. your art is important, but so is your livelihood. if you want to do what you want on your own terms, plan it, think it through, dude.

and no plan is ever perfect. there is always going to be some compromise, but hey, this is society. this is where people you trust come into play. as your operation becomes "international", there will be more hurdles. legal bs, cultural differences, monetary exchange rates, taxes, toilet seats in all shapes and sizes, coffee/tea that comes pre sugared with milk in a can, etc. but this is part of the fun. the world is different. it's getting closer but it's still different. enjoy it, embrace it. in these situations, all i can suggest is to be curious, courteous, well mannered and patient. the more distanced or isolated you become from your "pod", simple, human gestures and will become a lot more important, like to say hello or be courteous to a local helper, for example. also try to think outside of your box. your world/your culture is not the only one that exists on this land. believe me, i am bi-lingual/cultural, i know. that's 2 out of what, a few hundred? certain terms do not exist in one language or vice versa. how do you relay that sensation to another medium? how do you make a person aware of your intentions without invading them? not easy, innit.

i'm starting to shift, will probably reflecy more on cultural things another day, it is not an easy subject. oh, i am well aware of being borderline rude in a japanese context (challenging boundaries is often regarded as "out of place", whatever).

mr. steve albini.

if you think about it from that perspective, pretty true.

CAUTION, EXTREME GEARHEAD CONTENT. DO NOT EVEN SCROLL IF YOU'RE NOT INTO "KIT" or "EQUIPMENT".

here's the wombles. watch this and go away if you're not into gear.

and since i found it, barabara dickson. feeling sick now?

still here. ok, i've warned you.

GEAR SECTION

so i finally heard what the harmonic percolator sounds like. hmm. so it's a single ended amp. aha. kinda like a fender champ then. inneresting, inneresting......... i wonder if jxx and jxx have one?? it does sound pretty useful as as a "tobi dougu" which literally translated would be "tool to fly". a more considered translation would be "freakout tool". muso japanese, 201.

then i found another clip on the percolator. what he's saying makes total sense to me. it behaves like my fuzz face, i can't plug pedals before it, since it starts to behave very erratically (unless i want that sound). booooring, innit.

then i found the website to the clone people. barge concepts. so they out a switchable buffer in there. i'm all for HIGH QUALITY buffer amps, cos it makes regular guitar sounds more sexy, but in the context of fuzz boxes, which it's main intent, i reckon, is to make a fuzz, a noise, i don't see the point. like hendrix didn't have a buffer with his fuzz face, neither did keef on satisfaction with the maestro fz1, and i reckon jamc didn't use much with the shinei boxes.

there's a demo here, but the guy demo'ing it isn't convincing, at all. not that i would do a better job, but. come on, make it sound dirty.

fyi, i have talked to mr. albini on the phone only once so i would not count as one of his japanese friends that would milk this pedal to make a career out of. those peeps would be playing at places like super-deluxe in nishiazabu or 20000v in koenji or some arthouse reception, or they would be in osaka. high freq resonances make me want to go to to the loo. i hate strobe lights too, pikachu. a strobe light is also a "tobi dougu".

this is pretty fookin' great. i was actually looking for lulu.

this is the video that made me think "those blinking lights on that mixng desk is SEXY"

fyi, i think the desk they had at polar studios (abba hq) was a calrec at this point and the featured vocal mic is a pearl stereo model. i am not ashamed to say that i love abba.

exile

September 25, 2007

seriously a good read

you should go and read the original article here. http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/whats-the-future-of-the-music-industry-a-freakonomics-quorum/
the responses are interesting too. really.

" September 20, 2007, 2:07 pm
What's the Future of the Music Industry? A Freakonomics Quorum

By Stephen J. Dubner

Before I was in the writing industry, I was in the music industry.

While the economics of journalism have changed a lot over the past 20 years — witness the demise of Times Select and the potential demise of the Wall Street Journal's pay site — many other aspects of the writing industry haven't changed much at all. If you are a non-fiction writer who writes books, for instance, the economic setup is pretty much the same as it was, in large part because book publishers still primarily offer hard copies of books to people who pay money for them.

But the music industry of today looks almost nothing like the music industry of 20 years ago. There are a ton of reasons, most of them having to do with digital technology. If you are a young journalist starting out today, you may still aspire to get a big publisher to give you an advance and widely publish your book; but if you are a young musician starting out today, do you want to get a big record advance or do you want to sell the music yourself, like these folks do, and like Jane Siberry does? If you are a record label, what do you do about illegal downloads, and do you keep putting out "albums" that nobody buys or do you instead try to release only individual songs, as many people seem to prefer?

It strikes me as ironic that a new technology (digital music) may have accidentally forced record labels to abandon the status quo (releasing albums) and return to the past (selling singles). I sometimes think that the biggest mistake the record industry ever made was abandoning the pop single in the first place. Customers were forced to buy albums to get the one or two songs they loved; how many albums can you say that you truly love, or love even 50% of the songs — 10? 20? But now the people have spoken: they want one song at a time, digitally please, maybe even free (yikes: big can of worms, which is addressed ably below).

So what really happened to the music industry, and what will it look like in five or ten years?

That's the question we put to five smart people in our latest Freakonomics Quorum. I found their answers to be incredibly interesting, full of real information and clear-eyed thinking. (If you haven't already done so, you should also read Lynn Hirschberg's really good recent profile of Rick Rubin in the Times Magazine.) Huge thanks to all our participants. "

amazon shop

didn't seem like it would be launched this week, but they did. amazon.com are now selling mp3 downloads. here is a link.

here is an article on the basics. 2.3 million songs, not bad. it seems waaaay better than itunes japan (yeah, i'm being sarcastic). i can't buy anything from the store because i am in tokyo at the moment (they don't want my money it seems). maybe i'll try a few tricks later and see if i can fool them.

i did wander about the store and all in all, it gave me a good impression. i think there are issues with sorting out the database and everything, especially integrating the mp3's with the cd versions of the same. but with amazon, you can actually go to amazon.com, type in whatever artist name that strikes yer fancy, search, and then they will sell you a cd version or a mp3 version. that's er, cool (i never say cool, so that was a rare moment).

what i would like to see though, is more fun in the shopping experience. music is an experience, so i think sellers should try to sell more than just music. sorry to sound like a middle aged git, but regain that excitment of being in a record store, with vinyl, books, magazines, etc. there's a lot amazon can do to offer that experience and it's all pretty much there, the dots aren't connected yet. say for example if i went to amazon to buy a goodies dvd. i do my shopping ladida, then amazon starts recommending me motorbikin' by chris spedding (i think he played on some goodies tunes, or was that the wombles?). then chris spedding might lead me to wilco johnson and dr. feelgood, then to ian dury, then to pub rock, then to punk, then to lots of music and books and all that with scantily clad women down a coalmine, eating fine crunchy frog chocolate with baked beans on toast. ugh, typing that gave me heartburn just now.

oh, and i dunno about thr 256kbps resolution on the mp3's. i'm used to mp3's now, so i can't really handle anything lower than 320kbps myserlf, but maybe i'm being snobbish.

i hope this store does well, because it's more than just selling a download, you can buy related items to a lawnmower. that sounds like an american mall concept.......... dunno if i like that, but time will prove itself....... so when's it happening in japan then?

it kind of reflects on what i've been thinking since sunday, which is cultural divide.

September 22, 2007

blimey, i wasn't that far off, was i?????

http://news.zdnet.com/2422-13568_22-153609.html

(sir) tim berners-lee wiki

when the word "buss" was used, i felt very intimate with the approach. we use the word "buss" in the world of audio production (in simple speak, the recording studio), so all we're talking about, is signal (data) flow. in the world of audio, these would be signal assignments and a patchbay. so what tbl is talking here is that, currently, there seems to be compatiability issues with (in audio speak) different connectors, different formats, etc. sorry for being self absorbed, but this all makes sense.

wiki for "buss" (it also means to kiss, apparently!)

fuck, it's all a buss line!!!!! that's what it was!!!!!

three nil, hattrick

saxondale. series 2, episode 5. originally broadcast probably about 36 hours ago. on bbc, in the uk.
youtube and the people 3, the conventional media 0.

part 1






part 2








and part 3






love saxondale, the programme has respect for time and linear things as well as daily but someitmes important, nonsense. for me, it really triggers.

some of the songs mentioned in this episode;

i fought the law by the clash






which is actually a song by bobby fuller






then there's references to quincy, an american tv show from the 70's,
seems to be a recurring theme this, what's that one called nowadays, they have another one of those medical examiner type drama shows, seen it on cable. anyway i don't notice this theme song, so it must be one of the later epispodes.






then there's reference to rumpole of the bailey, which is a british counrt action tv drama. no youtube found, here's a wiki link

also mentions john grisham, you can google or amazon that.



judas priest, breaking the law






thin lizzy, jailbreak






i think there was also refrence to a 10cc song but i couldn't find it, so here's a different song. lol creme and kevin godley from 10cc later went onto form godley and creme, a musical and video act and pretty much pioneered promotion videos in the 80's.







here'a godley and creme song. i like this period of godley and creme. bio







another









fankie valli, grease ("it's got groove, it's got meaning"????)






travolta and newton john, you're the one that i want






all around 1978 i think it was. except the godley and creme and 10cc bits. g&c are around 80/81, 10cc, probably mid 70's? not really that well informed about that.

culture and music are all pretty much relational, i reckon. sometimes the art is so good that you don't notice it, or the creator isn't aware of it (which is the best situation in my world).

it's bloody wonderful that you can find all of this info inside a SINGLE tv show and reference it pretty much on the spot. these are stage 1 links, you can link from thin lizzy or the clash into something else and those will connect to something else. get it, it's a relational database with a useless front end interface. what if all these things were made avaibale for relatively cheap? new stuff such as saxondale would have to cost more than older catalogue stuff, but. think about the possible expansion of available mediums. get it? it's about selling an experience. oh, i just gave away my thought of the week, but i don't fookin' care.

and anyone can express themselves as to what makes them "click". there are pros and cons to any new medium, but in my world, all this has more advantages than dis. using a current, new creation of the programme as catalyst, i get to trigger memories and recreate my little virtual world of my life thus far. i've shown you some of mine, why don't you show me yours?

September 19, 2007

that was, pretty clear

September 18, 2007

yohoho and a hohoho

http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2007/09/09082007-the-bl.html

................"Went to see a show by Tucker Nichols, and his gallerist was thrilled by the crowds. He viewed it as "isn't it great that everyone is interested in art now!" Cindy was more skeptical — she suggested they might not all be here primarily to view art. I could see both sides: there were indeed, as she implied, a lot of people, young men and women, just hanging out, mostly on the sidewalks, hoping to "make some new friends." It's a social scene as much as anything. Art has become a thing, a life accessory, which one must become knowledgeable about. In that sense it is a lifestyle and status marker — being aware of art implies that you are refined, interesting, and possibly… rich. The comment by the gallerist also seems to imply or infer that art appreciation is somehow good for you. In fact, it might even make you a better person. The increased interest in art is not just good for his business, but for the minds and souls of the public.

I don't believe that. I don't think viewing art makes you more moral or better in any way shape or form. I believe that this idea might be a holdover from the past, when art collecting and appreciating was the preserve of the landed classes. Since — subtly now, but more obviously in the past — the upper classes let everyone know that they are more refined than everyone else, then by inference, liking what they like might make you better and more refined too. Right? Some of it might rub off. At least it would get you closer to money and power, and that couldn't hurt. Imagine if someone said that stamp collecting made you a better person."......................

yo ho ho ho, ho?

http://www.talklikeapirateday.nl/les_talklikeapiratelesson.php

i've never played this. yo ho ho and a bottle of rum (that i can't fookin' drink). ho.













yeah, i am collecting atmp boots......... yo ho ho

now i really feel middle aged!

DON'T MAKE ME FEEL SCARED!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.millennialsconference.com/ny/

By the year 2010, Millennials, born between 1982 and 2000, will outnumber both Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers and will be the most significant consumer sector for the media & entertainment industries.

Not only will they be big; they will be fragmented and difficult to reach. The increasing number of media channels - instant messaging, email, social networks, chat rooms, iPods, mobile phones, MP3 Players, P2P networks, handheld devices, digital video recorders, video games, game consoles and next generation communities and devices - through which this generation communicates and consumes media & entertainment, makes them a highly elusive target for businesses hoping to reach to them.

The Millennials Conference focuses on programming and marketing to this unique generation - one fully embracing a pervasively digital world. Participants will learn:

* What makes this generation tick?
* How do you deliver the right message?
* How do you design a product or service that will enhance and empower their lifestyles as well as allow self-expression?
* How do you monetize new viral economies like MySpace, Second Life & YouTube?
* What new business models are emerging for consumer-generated media?

rta

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/opinion/18ito.html?ei=5090&en=da38c67fa3aa329c&ex=1347768000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

September 18, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
In Japan, Stagnation Wins Again
By JOICHI ITO

Inbamura, Japan

SHINZO ABE, who stepped down as prime minister last week, is what we call in Japan an "obocchan." An obocchan is a type of well-to-do, slightly spoiled child of a powerful family. Mr. Abe may have been an obocchan but, wanting to be liked by everyone, he made efforts to address the concerns of the working class. Yet despite his efforts, most Japanese felt that he was unaware of working-class issues, and that — more than any political scandals the press has been crowing about — may have been his undoing.

More broadly, while most people liked Mr. Abe and believed him to be smart, the Japanese news media often called him "Kuuki ga Yomenai" or, for short, "K. Y." "Kuuki" means "air" and "yomenai" means "cannot read." Not being able to read the air means that you don't know that your guest wants another cup of tea or that you should be serving cold tea because it is a hot day. Reading the air is an essential trait for a Japanese politician.

This shortcoming put Mr. Abe at a severe disadvantage compared with his predecessor, Junichiro Koizumi. Mr. Koizumi is famous not only for being the master of reading the air but also for his unmatched ability to ignore the advice of the political elite. I would call this the "sonnano kankeinei" style. The catchphrase of a popular Japanese comedian whose routine has spread widely on YouTube, sonnano kankeinei is a crude way of saying, "So what? I don't care." It would be an uncommon attitude for a politician even in America, and in Japan was simply unprecedented.

It was a tough act to follow, and Mr. Abe tried to read the air but ended up following too much advice and yielding to the various centers of power and special interests to which his Liberal Democratic Party has owed its 50-year near monopoly. The result, unsurprisingly, was wishy-washy, ineffective policy.

For instance, he had the right idea in trying to shake up the government's stagnant bureaucracy. But instead of taking on a single group of bureaucrats in a winnable battle — as Mr. Koizumi did when he pushed through a bill privatizing the postal system in 2005 — Mr. Abe tried to change the broader fundamental laws governing federal agencies. The bureaucrats and their supporters in the Parliament turned on him, and he was stuck in a fight he couldn't win. Very K. Y.

The biggest example of his weakness, however, came when the government lost the pension records of 50 million workers. In most countries, this would have caused a riot, if not a revolution. Although concerns over possible missing records spread among the public late last year, Mr. Abe did not act until the spring.

Many in the public felt he delayed because the government bureaucrats and business executives closest to him probably didn't know anyone who was affected by the mismanagement of the records. Possibly, but again I think his failure stemmed not from his insulation but from his crippling Kuuki ga Yomenai.

These sorts of misjudgments, combined with the string of scandals resulted in the resignation of several cabinet members and the suicide of another, were what most pundits feel caused the Liberal Democrats' disastrous showing at the polls in July. To some extent that is true. But another huge factor that went to alienating voters was concerns over what the government and news media like to call Japan's current economic "recovery."

The problem is that most Japanese know that the so-called recovery is fueled by exports to China, particularly construction materials and energy. The steel, cement and coal companies are prospering. Chinese money is filling the coffers of the industries that have fueled the political system since World War II and were a big part of the bubble collapse that has left the economy stagnant for more than a decade.

Chinese demand is pumping up the value of the large raw materials and construction companies, trading firms with positions in commodities like coal, and businesses that sell overseas. But most domestic companies are seeing only an increase in their raw material costs without a significant increase in demand or margins locally.

Most of this money is viewed as sloshing around in the markets and the bank accounts of the elite, with very little trickling down to small companies or the average salaryman. One of my favorite indicators of the word on the street is the Tokyo taxi drivers, and when I bring up the subject, every one asks me something along the lines of, "Why do they keep saying that our economy has recovered?"

The other problem with this "recovery" is that it reinforces the old stereotype that Japan's strength lies in construction and exports. While this was a good strategy for the postwar recovery, it now slows down reform and diverts valuable human and public resources from the stunted service and high-tech industries that Japan needs for long-term growth.

It's no coincidence that before he entered politics, Mr. Abe was an executive at Kobe Steel. And his successor will be more of the same: the two contenders for his job both have backgrounds in raw materials. Taro Aso's family company is one of the largest mining and cement concerns in Japan, and Yusuo Fukuda's business experience is in oil.

This reflects a fundamental problem with Japanese politics. In a policy supported in part by the American fear of the threat of communism, the conservative Liberal Democrats stamped out all liberal resistance by either destroying the careers of members of the opposition or co-opting them. This resulted in a single-party system, with disputes negotiated and settled within the Liberal Democratic Party though a complicated process of factions and committees.

Many Japanese called this a "democracy in democracy." Perhaps, but this democracy in democracy was only visible to those in power and is managed mostly through a system of pork-barrel politics.

In July, the people had had enough and voted against the ruling party, but the result could be even worse. In deposing Mr. Abe, who despite being part of an old political family was still something of an outsider, they will see a return of the Liberal Democrats' old guard.

Nor is the opposition any better. The leader of the Democratic Party of Japan is Ichiro Ozawa, a student of Kakuei Tanaka, the prime minister who in the 1970s fashioned a public-funds-for-votes system and "rebuilt" Japan by paving the countryside with concrete.

Perhaps there is a silver lining: the weakness of the Liberal Democrats may give us the first sustained period of two-party politics since 1955. If so, the real question is whether it will allow any fresh blood in the political system.

Unfortunately, Japanese politics is a time-consuming and thankless task. Young entrepreneurial types shun public service. Mr. Koizumi made a serious effort to get people from outside the old party to run, but most of those young politicians have already dropped out. (I've rejected entreaties by both parties to run for office and have no regrets; according to my friends in junior positions in the Liberal Democratic Party, their first years have been spent in minor working groups, never being allowed to speak up at or attend any meetings of importance.)

The heart of the problem is that true multiparty politics should have started in Japan decades ago. Soon the members of our own postwar baby boom will be retiring. The looming crisis of a bankrupt Japan, a overburdened pension system and a corporate ecology of pumped-up old-economy companies will be upon us.

The man on the street knows this, but in a country that boasts of never having had a successful revolt of the people, or even a popular uprising resulting in significant reforms, it's unlikely that such awareness will be enough to punch through the K. Y. elite and make things change.

Maybe it's time for a revolution.

Joichi Ito is the chief executive of a venture capital firm and chairman of Creative Commons, a nonprofit group that develops flexible copyright arrangements.

September 17, 2007

http://www.bbc.co.uk/musictv/factory/video/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/musictv/factory/video/

i'm not a huge new order/joy division/whatever fan (last time i saw them live was like 84 or whatever that was........god i feel old) but i have always been intrigued by the driving force that was factory records.

spiralfrog.com

i checked out this website this morning. you can't actually access is unless you live in america, so you have to go through a proxy server (confusing?)....... google "free proxy server" and try one of the top 20 listings. i managed to take a lookie.

sprial frog is a website that just launched, which offers free music if you can tolerate the ads. i am personally a bit skeptical on the long term duration and effectivity of ads in itself, but hey, it is moolah. i didn't bother to download anything and it seems you can't transfer it to your ipod (yeah right, you could if you wanted to......) and you have to log in at least once a month or something, which means they force feed you ads.

what bugged me about it was the user interface and the lacking depth in catalogue. it seems like it's full of stuff on major labels, which is fine, but the only difference being, that it's free if you get mind raped by ads. then i could go to thepiratebay.org or some other torent site and download the same thing (and portable to an ipod) for free....... i don;t think it really celebrates the joy of music that much........

oh, i am a former tennis boy. used to be serious at it till about 16. my friend j in ny started playing recently and he is one of the most unlikely of people to play the sport. it's a lot harder than you think. i have seen the might mcenroe play before my very eyes at his peak a couple of times, once with jimmy conners and it was a good rock show, definitely gave me the horn. i don't like bjorn, he does not give me the horn.

get it on

I knew this day would come, but it does feel sad.

Virgin started out as magazine which evolved to a record shop.
Just like Rough Trade and Beggars Banquet. I forget where the store was, but I do remember it being somewhere in central London. My father used to take us somewhere in the car and we'd drive in front of it.

Zavvi????
Wot's that, washing up liquid??

Better get it on then,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BBC NEWS
Branson sells Virgin music stores
Sir Richard Branson has sold his UK chain of Virgin record stores to a group of senior staff at the business.

The deal, whose value has not been disclosed, will see Virgin's 125 UK and Irish Megastores rebranded as Zavvi.

The business will continue to be run by the current management team headed by managing director Simon Douglas.

High Street music retailers have been fighting for their survival as CD sales have been dramatically supplanted by digital music downloads.

'New brand'

HMV has suffered a sharp fall in sales while a number of smaller firms, including MVC, Music Choice and Fopp, have collapsed.

We have been withdrawing from entertainment retailing which is no longer viewed as core to the group's future
Sir Richard Branson

The deal ends Sir Richard Branson's 30-year involvement with High Street music retailing.

Earlier this year, he disposed of Virgin's US record stores.

"In the last six years we have been withdrawing from entertainment retailing which is no longer viewed as core to the group's future," Sir Richard said.

No details have been given of who is financing the management buyout.

The management team said it believed the business, which employs 2,500 staff, had a bright future despite the general music malaise on the High Street.

"We will deliver a new brand that lives and breathes entertainment and delivers high quality enthusiastic service to existing and new customers," Mr Douglas said.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/business/6998606.stm

Published: 2007/09/17 10:53:47 GMT

© BBC MMVII

yo, recovering hippie!

http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,2169767,00.html
New owner pledges to invest in artists at struggling EMI
· 'Big, but small enough to care' is mantra for change
· Dictatorship over, says News Corporation chief

Owen Gibson and Chris Tryhorn
Saturday September 15, 2007
The Guardian

The head of the private equity owner of EMI, the home of Robbie Williams and Coldplay, yesterday unveiled his vision for turning around the famous music label amid challenging industry conditions.

Guy Hands, chief executive and founder of Terra Firma, vowed to retain the group's recorded music division and to invest in artists big and small to restore the company's fortunes following its £2.4bn buyout.

The deal ended months of speculation over the future of EMI - which had endured a rollercoaster period of several years - and had led to the departure of chief executive Eric Nicoli.

Some analysts predicted Terra Firma would sell the recorded music side and retain EMI's profitable publishing division, but yesterday Mr Hands said that he was confident of overhauling EMI's model to make it less reliable on huge selling artists. "We're determined to keep that part of the business and we're determined to make it viable," he said, following a speech at the Royal Television Society media convention in Cambridge.

EMI was a "classic example" of Terra Firma's strategy to "look for the worst businesses we can find in the most challenging sector", and the firm was "just hoping EMI is as bad as we think it is".

Terra Firma made its name with several high profile turnaround stories. Its plan for EMI is expected to create a structure in which lower selling artists with more niche appeal can still be profitable. "The independent record labels are a lot livelier," said Mr Hands. "The vision of EMI is to be big enough to do everything we can for every artist, but small enough to care for every artist."

Mr Hands, who attended the Mercury Music prize and has been touring artists and their managers, added: "What you've got is an incredible history. It's extraordinary. They have a real love for EMI. But they need EMI to serve their artists in a way that is better than any of the other majors."

As well as the general malaise surrounding the industry due to the increase in digital piracy, EMI was hampered by a poor release schedule in 2007 and an over-reliance on a handful of big name artists.

Earlier at the RTS convention, Rupert Murdoch's most senior lieutenant had warned British broadcasters they must adapt to the digital landscape or wither on the vine.

Peter Chernin, the News Corporation chief operating officer who oversees large swathes of the company's media empire, told senior executives they must be willing to undergo a huge cultural shift and not be afraid of failure.

"There are huge rewards for those who innovate, and death to those who do not," he told delegates in Cambridge. The age of "dictatorship" was over for major media groups.

"Right now there are more than 300 million people around the world watching video content online. It's a fundamental shift that completely democratises our business. And democracy can be scary, especially when we've been used to living in a totalitarian state," he said.

Broadcasters have been wrestling with the challenge of maintaining revenues and viewers in the face of exploding choice and fragmenting media options. But, said Mr Chernin, media groups were well placed to benefit from an unprecedented period of technological change.

"The kneejerk reaction is to take potshots at what you don't understand. To dismiss user-generated content as crap, and blogs as unauthoritative, is not only unproductive but a waste of time," he said.

Fragmentation was having a positive effect on creativity, he believed. "The middle is dead, and that's the greatest thing that has ever happened. The bland, safe, central middle is never coming back."

And Mr Chernin echoed Mr Hands by saying companies should concentrate on big blockbusters at one end of the market and high quality niche offerings at the other.

Bias claim

Daily Telegraph editor Will Lewis has attacked what he called the the "leftwing bias" of broadcasters and said his newspaper intended to challenge them on the internet.

Mr Lewis, speaking at the RTS Cambridge convention yesterday, said he had been "staggered" by the amount of bias he had found in broadcasting.

"There is a lack of choice despite the amount of programming in terms of the leftwing bias we have in broadcasting which has staggered us," he said. "We are providing a different sort of programming for the millions of people in the UK who don't believe in the leftwing prism. The internet is incredibly liberating in that respect."

He said the Telegraph had decided not to follow the traditional broadcasters' way of doing things in its move into television with its partner ITN.

Mr Lewis said the changes he had implemented at the Telegraph, including a move to a new integrated newsroom in London's Victoria, had given an added focus to its website.
Leigh Holmwood

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
god knows why, but i just suddenly had a memory fancy for the old bubblicious tv ad song they used to do in england. it was er, a very bubbly melody, and if memory serves right, would of have been presented in the style of the "grease" soundtrack, a 50's/the fonz/happy days vibe.

so naturally, i go on youtube.

but i found this instead. man, america must of taken quite abit of aceeeed back then. but think about it. how would you of have been able to access thins kind of info till a few years ago? maybe it would inspire some 4 year old kid to make his own animation epic in all psychedelic colours.

has anyone had bubblicious nowadays? is it still around? if memory serves me right, it must taste annoyingly sweet.

September 16, 2007

i was not alone!

u shud chek aut ze rinc.
m
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.cnet.com/8301-13739_1-9775271-46.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TV Torrents: When 'piracy' is easier than legal purchase
Posted by Chris Soghoian
September 13, 2007 6:00 AM PDT
Practical Tips

NBC's recent withdraw from the iTunes store leaves the millions of users of Apple iPods without a legitimate way to purchase and watch NBC's content. Could this be the push that brings easy-to-use 'piracy' to the masses? This article discusses the issues, and then provides step-by-step instructions to setup a computer to automatically download any of hundreds of TV shows as soon as they are broadcast and put online.

With Apple's recent lovers's spat with NBC making the headlines, it seems like a good opportunity to examine the state of the online TV downloads, be they paid or 'pirated'. The end result of the dispute between the companies is that NBC's shows, which currently count for approximately one third of iTunes' TV show sales will no longer be available for sale at Apple's iTunes store. Customers wishing to purchase NBC's shows will now need to go through Amazon's Unbox service. While Unbox supports users of Windows and TiVo, Mac users, as well as those millions of iPod users are left out in the cold. Linux geeks, and those customers who have purchased divx/avi capable portable music players are also excluded, but this small subset of the market were equally ignored by Apple.

The Apple/NBC dispute, of course, only affects US based consumers. Foreigners, due to the lengthy delay between a show airing in the US in markets abroad, have already been driven to illegal file sharing. In Australia, where the broadcast of US shows is typically delayed between 22-30 months, many viewers have given up on waiting for their favorite shows to appear on the tube, and have instead turned to BitTorrent. According to a report published in 2006, "Australians are responsible for 15.6 percent of all online TV piracy, bested only by Britain, which accounts for 38.4 percent. The US lags behind in third position at 7.3 percent."

The legitimate and legal online media stores cannot compete with file sharing on price. Furthermore, as iTunes, Amazon, Walmart and the other stores all wrap their media in restrictive Digitial Rights Management (DRM), they cannot compete on freedom, flexibility and the ability to transfer purchased media to other devices. The only areas where they have the upper hand are in quality, and ease of use.

Warner Brothers' China division, in a rare act of intelligence on the part of a major media company, demonstrated significant savvy last year when they began selling cheap, legitimate, high quality DVDs of movies within days of the theatrical release. By pricing the discs at around 12 yuan (approximately US$1.50), Warner is hoping to make cost a non-issue, thus allowing them to compete in one area where they hold the upper hand: Quality. Instead of taking a chance with on a low quality, shaky-camcorder copy of a film, Chinese consumers can get a high quality copy of the movie at a reasonable price, all while enjoying the warm fuzzy feeling that you can get knowing that you've helped to pay for some small portion of a a Hollywood star's private jet.

Apple's iPod makes up more than 70 percent of the overall mobile player market. With those customers now completely cut-off from NBC's offerings, the ease-of-use advantage of legitimate purchase has been lost. While camcorder copies of films still make up a decent portion of movies on file sharing networks, the widespread availability of digital television and TV tuners in PCs means that it is trivially easy to find high-quality copies of TV shows on BitTorrent sites such as The Pirate Bay.

It's taken some time, but the 'piracy' path has finally gotten to be more user-friendly and easy to use than iTunes and the other pay-services. Miro, a multi-platform RSS and BitTorrent enabled media client is now very stable, polished and fast. Using a tool such as this, and a couple minutes of configuration to subscribe to your favorite shows, it's now possible for users worldwide to wake up to the latest episode of The Daily Show, without paying a penny, or being locked into a restrictive DRM scheme. It's still illegal of course, but that hasn't stopped the millions of file sharers who have made BitTorrent responsible for more than 25% of all Internet traffic.

It's worth noting at this point, that for people in India, the Middle East and other markets ignored by the major players, Linux users (for which iTunes, Amazon and Walmart's media stores do not work), Apple customers who wish to watch shows made by NBC or another network that won't play ball with Apple, or Windows users who are simply not willing to submit themselves to the shackles of DRM, illegal downloads are the only way to watch TV shows on their computers and portable media players. I'm not advocating illegal activity, but merely stating the facts.

If a user wishes to break the law (or they live in a country that doesn't respect US copyright law), lets see exactly how they could go about setting up their computer to auto-download their favorite TV shows. This information is, of course, for educational purposes only and I in no way encourage anyone to violate copyright laws.

-cont-

more hanky panky down a coalmine

http://www.last100.com/2007/09/10/internet-streaming-five-us-television-networks-compared/

Internet streaming: five U.S. television networks compared
by Daniel Langendorf
September 10th, 2007 | Posted in Net TV | 15 Comments

Internet streaming: five U.S. television networks comparedThe good news: Major U.S. television networks continue to embrace Internet technology and are putting their shows on the Web for online viewing, just like they did last year.

The bad news: Their online offerings remain sporadic; their Internet strategies feel like "we have to" rather than "we want to"; and — worst of all — they still haven't embraced the idea that we are living in a new digital world, with different rules, participants, and expectations all around.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I was thinking about this attitude issue the other night, actually. On youtube.com, they deleted the long version of Derek and Clive "the Horn". I was so enjoying this clip for the past month that I even had it as my start page for a few days.

Dude, you do not realise how much I have been waiting for digital media to arise. Back in the 80's or even the 90's, there was no way you could access any of this info as a consumer in Tokyo. If you wanted to rent Faulty Towers, it would of have been dubbed into Japanese; ok, good for the masses, but dude, I understand the lingo, the nuance. I'm sorry, I don't want some watership down'd version. Getting programmes or films that were not on the circuit in Japan was probabaly harder than getting child porn. My friend J, a British cunt that used to live in Tokyo running a record shop, he used to have them imported. Then of course, there was the format issue with NTSC and PAL (BBC joke. "Never Twice the Same Colour" "Perfection At Last" pretty true, actually). There was a deck it was a Sony or Panasonic, escapes me tha used to be able to swing any way. That was $2,000. What I used to do, was borrow a tape from James, probably just like you would do with kiddie porn, or whenever I would go to England or America, buy tapes. Then I'd go round to my old office (record company) or after that, mate's management companies and all that and copy them. Now, using other people's gear isn't the most fun, because they like to look at the content with you. Which is fine, but if they don't get it, you end up explaining it to your friends cos it would be rude. Then for me, the excitement goes away, I'd have to get into interpreter/translator mode and that just does not give me the horn. I'm telling ya, art and self expression is usually a personal experience and having to explain that is, not fun.What am I, some art critic?

Anyway, content owners. Think about the merits of digital distribution. Ok, converting your archives to a format is a NIGHTMARE, but what a man's gotta do, a man's gotta do.

Once it's online, someone out there, is going to find it. You cannot stop human curiosity, digital, illegal or not. As long as you have a captured audience that keeps bread on your table, the rest is extra pocket money.

Then I was thinking about that digital content for the price of a txt message idea. Personally, I would be a little careful and scared doing it to music (just because I work with it I suppose). But with video for example, I'd pay it. In fact, I'd pay 25 Cents or whatever for those clips on Youtube if I can download them and watch it on the computer and ipod. I don't even care about the visual quality that much, I'm not looking for some high def national geographic exotic fish in the bahamas documentary. I just want to laugh and forget where I am or who I am.

Think about it. I would probably spend around $2~4 per viewing. Same for music. There's no boxes of packaging, there's no discs to manufacture, inventory control would be the easiest thing ever. You don't have to chat up that regional sales guy, etc..........

The Mighty Boosh, my friend J turned me onto this. I know a lot of J's, come to think about it. I would of not found this if it were not for the internet. I probably would of still be watching my 15 year old videos of the best of the Goodies. There's good stuff, old and new, and it's not going to stop.





update:
i was just having my coffee and turned the tv on. i pretty much never watch the major channels anymore, maybe the news. i have cable, which is a minority appliance in japan. anyway, i was flicking through and noticed that they show the british show, the office now. i never watched it, so i had a bit of fun. but dude, how old is this show? they have an (apparently not so good) american version, so it must be at least 3, probably 5 years old. and FINALLY it's available.

think about the implications of this. any work of expression carries with it a background, language, culture, emotion, news of the times. 3 to 5 years is a long time for something to filter through. think of the time lag. the amount of possible inspiration wasted. granted, something like the office is probably not easy for the regular japanese housewife to understand (it's being shown on a female channel). but isn't that what they said for the show in america when it started?

don't close the door. leave it open. if it irritates you, think about why it irritates you.

one of my favourite writers is this guy called kenzaburo oe. he has some work translated to english and even won a nobel literature prize in 1994. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenzaburo_Oe
i've been reading his work on and off since high school, his early stuff was obviously influenced by the physical confusion that japan was in the 60's and beat culture. it was exiciting stuff for a frustrated high school kid. then as he got older, his style matured. the fact that his child is handicapped is apparently one major cause. he started writing about post war japan. one of his more recent writings basically says "don't sakoku the heart". "sakoku" is a japanese term, which represents the period (i am looking all this stuff up on the net) of isolation from 1639 to 1854 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan), where japan ceased to exchange any foreign influence or trade apart from portugal. this exchange was held on "dejima", an artificial island the siez of a new york block in nagasaki, south japan. i went there last year, look back on my myspace blog and you'll see pictures. anyway, kenzaburo oe is saying that japan has a tendency to "close country the heart".

i totally agree with him. humans are lazy fucks by nature, we like to fall back on what feels comfortable. for japan, that means rice eating, imperialist, nice, humble people. but dude, japan lives in modern times now, it is the physical asian hq of the american forces, a lot of companies, we're a capitalist nation. by pretending to be what we're not in reality, is causing a lot of problems. that reflects back into culture and spending. that's why the japanese education system is totally fucked as far as english learning is concerned. that's why you see all these english schools scattered around the country. when i was on tour in japan last year, i was astonished by the number of these schools and the frustration on both side, the teachers and pupils. at the bars, i saw frustrated teachers that come from the middle of nowheresville america, sent to nowheresville japan, so what do they do on their time off? drink and act like american pricks. pretty sad. all you need to see is a little ray of light.

for people that are to distribute content or create it, maybe it's just a matter of putting it out. anything, anything on any level. look, i understand you wnat to hold off so that you don't undersell. but take the office for example. it is probably one of the bbc's biggest shows and where does it end up in japan? on a fucking cable channel on sunday daytime. who watches this? me, obviously......... but i only found out by accident. same for doctor who. they started showing the new version recently, but think about how many episodes there is of that.

just put it out, see what happens. if you track enough attention, then you can hire the translator to subtitle it, or distribute it to the mass. it you want to be big in japan, it's got to work both ways. it still needs a good idea and a person that appreciates it and can interpret it.

yes, i am very frustrated.

September 15, 2007

http://www.netdisaster.com/

http://www.netdisaster.com/

http://www.jamendo.com/

http://www.jamendo.com/
i thought this was a good idea. it's definitely somewhere to start for the upcoming.

http://torrentfreak.com/jamendo-download-thousands-of-free-and-legal-music-albums-070831/
Jamendo is a great place for artists to publish their creative works and make it available to a wide audience. Users of the site can download these albums for free and donate directly to the artist if they like what they hear. Jamendo uses BitTorrent (what else) to distribute the albums, and there is also an on-site player so you can listen to the album before you download it.

Jamendo has a great look and the site is easy to navigate. It supports tagging, playlists, album blogging and all the other features a "social" music sharing community needs. The site continues to grow and they recently received a significant amount of funding from Mangrove Capital Partners, the same people who supported Skype in its early days. With this funding, they plan improve the site and introduce new features.

David Waroquier, of Mangrove Capital Partners said in a response: "With the aim at becoming the biggest independent music portal online, we believe Jamendo is the most appropriate and flexible answer to the current online revolution that the music industry is facing: providing unsigned artists with revenue opportunities all the while enabling the users to listen and download music for free", said .

Laurent Kratz Founder and CEO of Jamendo was of course very satisfied with the first round of funding they closed and commented: "With this funding, we plan to become the undisputed global player of free music. We are economically supporting and promoting the long tail of music. We have a proven business model where music is not only proposed for free to end consumers but we are also closing an increasing number of partnership agreements and licensing deals."

All albums are available in MP3 (~200Kbps) and Ogg Vorbis (300Kbps) format, and can be downloaded with your favorite BitTorrent client or Emule. A great initiative that benefits both the artist and the fans, that's how it's supposed to be.

the prince of whales

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB118980966247828081.html

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB118980966247828081.html

U.S. Repels British Invasion
Immigration policy collides with surge of U.K. bands, scuttling fall concert plans
By JOHN JURGENSEN
September 15, 2007; Page W1

British pop star Lily Allen was supposed to perform at the MTV Video Music Awards last weekend and then head to the West Coast for the week of sold-out concerts she had booked. Instead, she spent this past week at home in London.

The reason: The chart-topping singer can't get into the U.S. American authorities took away her immigration visa last month.

This fall, the British aren't coming. Immigration restrictions are stopping some popular United Kingdom acts from reaching U.S. borders. At least three anticipated tours by British artists scheduled for this month alone have been called off or pushed back because of musicians' visa problems. That is on top of at least 10 scuttled tours by buzzed-about British acts in the last year.

Part of the problem, immigration specialists say: The traditional visa system isn't set up to cope with the new face of popular music. To get into the U.S., many foreign music acts need to secure a document known as the "P-1"-class visa. This visa requires acts to prove that they have been "internationally recognized" for a "sustained and substantial" amount of time.

But in the current music scene, some of the most sought-after bands are ones that didn't exist two years ago and have risen rapidly thanks to exposure on the Internet. These bands, with huge fan followings but short track records, are finding themselves trying to prove to immigration officials that they are famous.

For the English band Klaxons, that meant submitting clips of magazine reviews as part of their visa application package last year. The band, which last week won the U.K.'s prestigious Nationwide Mercury Prize, is known for a driving mix of dance, pop and rock that sparks frenzied live shows. After forming in the fall of 2005, the group quickly ascended to fame in England, thanks in large part to buzz on MySpace.

Last fall, the group landed a spot at the CMJ music festival in New York, an annual showcase of new talent. But its visa request was delayed when immigration officials said they needed more evidence of the band's longevity. About a week before its scheduled trip to the U.S., the band pulled the plug on the tour. The group waited another seven months to enter the U.S.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a division of the Department of Homeland Security, says that the Internet has changed the kind of evidence that bands present -- posts from blogs and online magazines now appear in application packages. But the agency says it will only consider these sources if the band can prove that they are well-read and influential. The burden of proof falls on the band.

"We're not Simon Cowell. We're the people who have to know why this group qualifies," says Robert DeJulius, an adjudications supervisor at one of the two service centers that processes P-1 visas. Mr. DeJulius adds that his center has, in fact, processed the petition of Mr. Cowell, the "American Idol" judge.

Immigration restrictions have affected fields from investment banking to biotechnology in recent years. In the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and a national debate on immigration, some companies say they have had more trouble bringing in talented people from abroad. The pop-music world is dealing with its own version of this issue.

Emerging indie bands account for a small portion of music-industry revenues. But concert promoters and clubs typically take a hit whenever there's a cancellation. Live concerts are one of the only bright spots in the music business now. Box-office grosses for the top 100 concerts increased by 3.7% to $1.05 billion for the first half of 2007 over the same period last year, according to Pollstar. Meanwhile, album sales fell by 15.1% in that period, according to Nielsen SoundScan.


As a result of Ms. Allen's tour cancellation, instead of being packed to its 1,500-person capacity Friday night, the Crystal Ballroom in Portland, Ore., was empty. The club didn't collect the $10,000 rental fee it would have gotten for the performance from local promoter Monqui Presents, which had spent about $2,000 advertising the show.

"Being dark on a Friday night, it's a big loss," says Jimi Biron, a booker for McMenamins, the club chain that owns the Crystal Ballroom and 15 other venues.

Had the tour happened, Ms. Allen would have collected up to $120,000 for six concerts, according to someone familiar with her earnings. She also could have pocketed up to $10,000 per concert in merchandise sales. Harder to estimate is the loss for Ms. Allen and her record label, Capitol, in album sales her tour could have spurred.

"It's going to slow momentum down," says Ms. Allen's manager, Neale Easterby. "We just want to get back out there."

In Ms. Allen's case, it wasn't lack of recognition that caused her visa problems. According to her manager, Ms. Allen had a one-year visa that was valid until Sept. 25. But it was taken away on Aug. 5 when she landed in Los Angeles. Her manager says he thinks the visa might have been revoked because Ms. Allen had been arrested in London in June after an altercation with photographers. USCIS says it does not comment on individual cases. Ms. Allen declined to comment.

All this comes as some foreign governments are ramping up efforts to export pop music. New Zealand, for instance, has formed a music commission with a $400,000 budget to support the country's music acts on tours abroad. At least three bands will play New Zealand's first showcase concert at the CMJ festival next month.

"We've seen a much more aggressive effort from the cultural export agencies. I see it as the globalization of the music marketplace," says CMJ founder Robert Haber. This year, bands from 50 countries are slated to perform at the event, up from about 30 countries three years ago.

The Internet has made it easier for bands to build American fan bases before they ever land on U.S. shores. When the London indie-rock band Mystery Jets had to cancel its U.S. concert debut this summer because of visa problems, 21-year-old Krisan Cieszkiewicz of Portage, Ind., was devastated. "I've never experienced anything more heartbreaking or cruel in my life," says Ms. Cieszkiewicz, who had planned to see the band in Chicago.

Canceled tours by British groups attract particular notice, in part because of a surge of British acts on the U.S. music scene. In the past two years, some of the best-selling albums in the U.S. have come from artists including James Blunt and Coldplay.

The P-1 is one of several classes of visas that entertainers can use to enter the U.S. to work. Superstars and others deemed to have "extraordinary ability" typically receive an "O-1" visa.

The number of P-1 visa applications approved by the U.S. government -- which also includes visas for athletes and can include groups ranging from two to several dozen or more -- has actually risen slightly in recent years -- from 42,430 in 2001 to 46,205 in 2006. But some immigration experts say the visa process has become stricter and more complex for musicians.

Before 2001, for example, tour managers were allowed to bring band members' visa documents to local U.S. consulates for visa approval. Now, each applicant must appear in person at a U.S. embassy for fingerprinting, a retinal scan and an interview.

New guidelines allow acts to submit visa applications up to a year ahead of a tour, but most clubs won't schedule shows more than a few months ahead. Bands often pay an extra $1,000 fee for speedier "premium" processing.

These logistical headaches are David King's bread and butter. Mr. King runs the New York-based Traffic Control Group, a company to which many bands turn for visa help. His clients include Lily Allen, Elton John and Van Morrison.

A former insurance broker from England who became a U.S. citizen three years ago, Mr. King specializes in convincing immigration workers that his clients are, in fact, famous.

On his office wall, Mr. King tracks pending tour deadlines on a large whiteboard. He says he has had only a handful of outright visa denials in his 10 years at Traffic Control; he turns down potential clients if he senses they won't pass muster.

"We have a reputation to keep up," he says. "I say, 'Go away and come back in a year.' "
Write to John Jurgensen at john.jurgensen@wsj.com9

Copyright 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

http://blog.compete.com/2007/09/14/facebook-activity-breakdown-application/

myspace will hate me for posting this. i swing both ways and in a nutshell, i find that;

myspace: architecture is too cluttered. content driven (especially those that stimulate human desire).
facebook: seems to be a more robust architecture. cleaner. ability to add/delete features via applications is a BIG plus. content may be a bit too tame. but they've only been open to us non student types for a few months. get rid of that college vibe but keep it down on the bling bling.

and myspace japan. STOP messing with my interface. i DON'T want to see your ugly translations and interfaces (sorry kid, you'll have to work harder). think from the core motivation/cultutre. translation is not a mechanical process, it is an offering of experience (dude, i have done it translation work, so i am not a drunk guy ranting on the street).

you can track my ip and make sure i get a friggn japanese menu automatically, that looks downright ugly. but what if the person can't read the lingo? i keep reverting it back to english manually, and the other day, i accidentally made it spanish. there was no simple "go back" or "revert to original language" button. i had to go to some other european language that would display english and go from there. try to explain that process to my mother.

**********************************************************************************
http://blog.compete.com/2007/09/14/facebook-activity-breakdown-application/

14 million people interacted with Facebook Applications in August

Facebook has been impressing more than just Compete over the past few months. As we reported on Tuesday, for the month of August, the social networking rising star is now ranked third in terms of pageviews, and may have started to finally pull users away from MySpace. But if Facebook was a novel, this domain level traffic would be the jacket; to get to the story you have to open it up…so here’s chapter one.

Because of the Facebook’s design, it is essentially impossible to do anything as a non-member. While Facebook received over 26 million visitors in August, a little over 22 million end up signing in. The chart is a visual representation of the Activities that the Facebook community used in August. The size of each circle represents the share of total Facebook visitors who are involved in each activity, and the shade of color represents intensity of use (based on both visits per month and time per visit). For each activity, the number of monthly visitors, total number of visits and time spent during each visit is listed within each activity’s circle.

Of the 22 Million people who logged into Facebook in August, nearly 21 Million go on to check their profile or their friends. Beyond that, activities differ:

* 14 million people interacted with Facebook Applications in August.
* Applications are also highly engaging; capturing more time per session than any other activity on the site.
* Over 16 Million people browsed photos in August. On average, they viewed nearly 150 per month.
* Only 80,000 (or .3% of total active members) “poked” someone in August.

Facebook’s story is far from over. With school back in session how will things change? What sort of implications will search indexing have on site growth, member privacy, and member engagement? We’ll cover all this and more before we close this book.

* Note: the “read discussion boards” activity is defined as opening up a specific group’s discussion board, as opposed to reading the latest comments on a group’s home page.

September 14, 2007

for those about to.......

i am enjoying saxondale, a lot.
series 2, episode 4. thank you, youtube.com 1, bbc world japan o,
get it together.

pt1

pt2

pt3

Left/Right

oooh, my typical cancerian habits have lead me into a pattern of irregular sleep and too much waste this week. again. but hey, i love myself. i have been feeling rather down. got to look after meself.

i never made this "public" but i will now. i don't fucking care. i have a life i need to lead.
i want out of japan. i love this country, but it just ain't sync'ing to what i am being.

i am fairly good at cooking and all that household stuff, not good at cleaning up. pretty straightforward but complex, cancer/leo type (so said those websites). my friend j is going to read my palms soon, so if interested, more info forthcoming.

left handed, non smoking, non drinking, i like walks, reading, watching british comedy and am geeky. quite harmless. bilingual. not bisexual. probably will make a decent housewife. any takers? you fucking cunt.

i am a bit mad

as most of you know by now.












i actually remember seeing this one. cos i had to see it in the dark, hiding from the parents ("none of that noisy rock music!")






they used to fucking have a fucking longer fucking version of this on fucking you fucking tube, but some fucking cunt fucking erased it, the fucking cunt. the longer version woz like, fucking 9 minutes long you fucking cunt and it was fucking miles better you fucking cunt.

watch bambi you fucking cunt.

this is really interesting

http://hublog.hubmed.org/archives/001533.html

2007-09-12_uk-vs-the-world.png

September 13, 2007

inneressssssting.........

http://www.music2dot0.com/archives/36

Music 2.0 - Exploring Chaos in Digital Music
September 11, 2007
Trent Reznor gives Rip-off Avoidance, Download & Share advice to fans
Filed under: Music Industry — maths @ 5:58 pm

NIN v1Trent Reznor

I managed to catch Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor backstage for a chat on his views on copyright and digital music distribution just before they played at the Beijing Pop Festival on 9 Sep.

In May this year, Reznor famously launched a tirade against his label Universal Music in Australia when he found out:

"Year Zero is selling for $34.99 Australian dollars ($29.10 US). No wonder people steal music. Avril Lavigne's record in the same store was $21.99 ($18.21 US). By the way, when I asked a label rep about this, his response was: "It's because we know you have a real core audience that will pay whatever it costs when you put something out - you know, true fans. It's the pop stuff we have to discount to get people to buy." So, I guess as a reward for being a "true fan" you get ripped off. "

And this week in Beijing, he again reiterated his disgust with the labels by stating

"We will put out one last album for Universal and after that we will sell albums directly to fans from our website at (say) $4 an album".

In full empathy with their fans, he even prepared a Chinese language section on the NIN website in preparation for their first ever concert in China, with a heartfelt message to his Chinese fans which translates as follows:

"As for the special situation in China, it does not seem to be easy to obtain Western music via legal channels, so I have the following suggestion for our fans: If you can find and buy our legal CDs, I express my thanks for your support. If you cannot find it, I think that downloading from the Internet is a more acceptable option than buying pirated CDs. Our music is easy to find on the Internet, and you might not need to spend much effort to find most of our songs. If you like our songs after you've heard them, please feel free to share it with your friends. As I have put all my effort and heart into my music, I sincerely hope that more and more people can share the enjoyment with us."

Reznor is adamant that fans should not have to jump through hoops of fire and pay unreasonable prices simply to get NIN's music – least of all in this day and age when every conceivable work of music could be made available a click away online.

As he pointed out, the world is getting smaller but labels are not taking advantage of this opportunity to put this music conveniently in front of fans. As proof of his intent and anger at artificial borders being upheld for profit, Reznor vetoed a label-planned European maxi-single for the song Capital G opting instead to release a Year Zero remix album at some point in the future. This way, fervent U.S. fans would not be forced to have to spend $30+ to import a two-song single that includes one new remix.

Reznor also stated that

"Since the CD came on the market, even with its relatively lower production costs compared to vinyl, labels saw it fit to increase prices exorbitantly while artists' age-old contracts meant they got the same amount as before - and even granting that the labels invest in marketing and take risks, it is still a great rip-off".

In his view, true fans are being made to pay to sustain the fat paychecks of label execs. These were the exact same sentiments that have been expressed by Chuck D of Public Enemy before –coincidentally Public Enemy was the other headlining act at the Beijing Pop Festival.

As a point of note, HMV is still selling music at global rate prices of US$18 in a lot of markets with imports going for the ridiculous price of US$25 and more. Makes one wonder if this also falls under the pirate CD category!

Reznor also thinks that DRM infested formats including the ones from iTunes do not serve fans well and he totally understands why they would instead resort to downloading ubiquitous DRM-free mp3s from BT and P2P networks.

Lest the misguided 'music wants to be free' movement conveniently hijack Reznor's stance as an endorsement to free-load, he emphatically states that there has to be a way that musicians are compensated without imposing barriers to fans and abusing their trust by commanding unfair price premiums.. Hence NIN has built up an outstanding website not only to communicate directly with fans but with a view to making it easy to access their music at a fair price once NIN's label dues are completed.

And what about the music?

Reznor reaffirmed his commitment to carrying on making the kind of music that's brought them this far and which they still believe in. He also panned label executives who are panicking at the downturn in the music industry and subsequently try to force artists to adopt "flavor of the month Timbaland productions" as the panacea for their self-inflicted afflictions.

Reznor further added,

"We didn't know what to expect in China as it is our first time here, so we brought all our equipment along. We didn't want to compromise in any way and wanted to give fans the full Nine Inch Nails experience. I think we might probably have even lost some money on this show"

And what a fantastic show it was – probably one of the more amazing shows seen in China. Credit to Beijing Pop Festival organizer Jason Magnus who moved mountains in China to put together a radical non-conformist line-up of NIN, Public Enemy, New York Dolls, Ramones (Marky) and rebel Chinese rocker Cui Jian amongst others.

However, in this digital age, the next radical act in the music industry will probably be played out online and Trent Reznor has already set the stage for it.

dude!

http://www.techgnosis.com/chunks.php?sec=journal&cat=noting&file=chunkfrom-2007-09-08-2341-0.txt

and

http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/09/erik-davis-on-waterm.html

and

http://idolator.com/tunes/you-are-being-watched/watermarked-cds-cause-paranoia-to-be-added-to-long-list-of-music-critics-problems-298040.php

and

http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2007/09/watermarked_cds.php

fyi, it's ILLEGAL to sell "sample" CD's in Japan. there are certain shops that do buy them (like that one in Shibuya, hehehe.......) but it principle, illegal. another fyi, the liars album was made non commercially but very utopianly available to the controlled online public, days after it was turned into the record label.

dude, if you want to make a living writing about bands, do try not to shoot them......... but then again, if you went to burning man, you're probably some mushroom loving hippie.

duh

ps: the dude says "even casette"........man, back in the "day" (i feel old again), in the golden age of expense accounts that was the 1990's, most samples were on tape.

hey, maybe we should bring back casette samples. lofi is back!!!!

i have a hard time buying good quality tape stock (i use them with other machines), so i'm all for that. fuck the CD.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My Data Crime
The Ticking Time Bomb of the Watermarked Advance CD


September 8, 2007


Shortly after returning from Burning Man this last week, I hit the blobular button on my answering machine and heard the voice of a reporter who said she was from Billboard magazine. She wanted to talk to me about the "Beirut advance leak" that had apparently stirred up a flurry of email. I had no idea what she was talking about, and left a message for her to that effect.

Then I checked my email and discovered a number of furious and threatening emails from a dude named Ben Goldberg, who runs a pretty cool indy rock record label in New Jersey called Ba Da Bing. Goldber has put out good records by acts I love and have reviewed favorably over the years, like Comets on Fire and the obscure and mighty Dead C. One of his forthcoming records, due out next month, is The Flying Club Cup, the second release from Beirut, a one-man bedroom band from Albuquerque that put out last year's The Gulag Orkestar, a marvelous folk-rock Balkan fantasia. As these emails made clear, Beirut's sophomore release had been leaked to an online file-sharing network around August 26th. Labels hate this kind of shit, which is why many of them are marking their advance disc with digital watermarks. And in this case the digital watermark attached to the uploaded file pointed squarely at yours truly.

For those of you who have not squandered your adult life writing about popular music, some background may be in order. Record companies have been supplying music critics with free copies of their releases for decades. In fact, free and early-release records is one reason that many folks get into this dubious bag in the first place. Believe you me: many a dark day of freelance frustration has been redeemed by the Christmas horde of media product on the doorstep.

Over the years, I have received hundreds and hundreds of LPs, CDs, even cassette tapes. Many of these releases have been advance recordings handed out months ahead of official relief, a gap in time designed to give critics a running start for "long lead" publications like magazines. Advances, which these days are sometimes just CD-Rs, generally come packaged in next to nothing—a plain cardboard sleeve or the occasional white label.

Advances are weird things—I generally don't request them, and yet they are given to me, and yet they are not mine. Technically, the physical advance or promotional recording belongs to the record company, and is considered to be loaned to the writer, who, needless to say, signs no contract. Some promos are even stamped with the Indian giver command: "Must be Returned on Demand of Recording Company." Ha! Scruffy freelance writers or mag editors almost universally treat these objects as their own property—property that is either hoarded or dispensed with. Usually, but not always, this means being sold—an act which, along with any form of "transfer," is not only against the rules but is, as any haunter of used record stores knows, widely practiced throughout the known universe.

The rise of file-sharing has sent the peculiar and informal gift economy of promotional parasitism into a tailspin. File-sharing networks award both status points and downloading rights for uploads, and nothing scores so dependably as a desirable advance. There's even a shadowy underground cabal called The Scene, populated by dedicated uploaders who lurk in the upstream canyons of data dissemination. Their efforts upset the final act of control that record companies can exert on their products, which is to tightly manage the timing of their release, allowing availability to coincide with a surge of official publicity, and thereby increasing the likelihood—so the the thinking goes—of triggering a tipping point.

These days, like everybody else working with media properties, record companies are scrambling for technological solutions to a technological convulsion whose full cultural extent is incalculable. Music makers, promoters, writers, and fans are now forced to become negotiators of the meaning of intellectual property in an era of shared and infectious data. One irritating and insufficient solution is the online, password-protected streaming link. Weee. Even more annoying are the listening parties held at corporate HQs, where a group of music writers all sit together and listen a single time to a forthcoming recording, and then shuffle home to scribble based on memory alone.

The other reigning technofix—the one employed by Ben Goldberg of Ba Da Bing—is watermarking. Because Goldberg had a lot riding on Beirut's sophomore record, he paid the considerable—and, from what I have heard from a Rhapsody mucketymuck, unnecessarily onerous—extra cost to have his advances individually watermarked, tying each unique disc to a particular recipient. And one of these watermarked advances was stamped with my name, slipped into a plain white envelope, and sent to me, who didn't even notice the name inscribed on the disc and therefore had no idea the advance was watermarked.

After fielding calls from Billboard and New York magazines, I of course looked for the Beirut advance, which really should have been squirreled away in that pile next to that other pile next to that box of old CDRs. I remember thinking that the record was decent if unremarkable, but that I had dug the first one so much that I needed to listen to it again before considering it a sophomore slump. But the CD was nowhere to be found.

Now there's a lot of media at my house, too much in fact, which is why I am not only a collector but also a purger, and am probably even more neurotic about purging than about collecting. Though I carefully and constantly weed my media, sometimes my life feels so out of control that I freak out and get rid of stuff in a hasty and non-methodical matter. A couple weeks before Burning Man, when my life was pretty chaotic, I had taken a huge load of stuff to a local thrift store. No doubt there were old advances in the bag, because nobody else is interested in them and it seems more productive to give them away than to throw them away. Though I have no way of knowing for sure, I suspect that the Beirut disc slipped into that pile and was subsequently discovered by one of the Bay Area's hipster record hounds. My bad.

But not my evil. My error was in losing track of a "smart" object, not in intentionally uploading a recording in order to gain status or share ratio. Publicly admitting one's file sharing habits is kinda like talking about porn, and I'm as shy as the next guy, but one thing's for sure: I would never upload an advance.

But Ben Goldberg didn't know this. After giving me less than 24 hours to respond to his initial accusation—during which time I was rambling around the Black Rock desert in a fire truck with a flame thrower on the roof—the label owner went on the warpath. He sent out emails to all his publicist contacts and indy label buddies about my evil ways, and was in addition stirring up as much journalistic interest as possible, giving The Flying Club Cup a nice dose of early publicity while also being able to tar and feather a suddenly non-anonymous practitioner of the file-sharing arts.

I felt pretty shitty about all this. Last year I wrote extensively about Joanna Newsom's Ys, which was famously leaked from a Pitchfork server, and I know the pain such leaks causes to artists and smaller labels alike. That said, I also know its not necessarily the worse thing in the life of a record, and I was pissed that Goldberg took to the wires before talking to me and trying to figure out why a 40-year-old guy who writes for righteous publications like Arthur would do something to fuck over a righteous independent label.

I called up a handful of my publicist friends, some of whom actually seemed to believe me, and eventually talked to Goldberg. I apologized, he explained his feelings, we bonded over our shared love of the Dead C. Hatchets were buried, and though I suspect my flow of advances might slow over the coming months, the prospect of being reviewed in Blender or Arthur will, in the end, keep most publicists supplying me with product—although the "product" in question will increasingly be a url. And people wonder why I mostly buy vinyl!

I would like to close with a brief meditation on the spooky, SciFi aspect of all of this. By watermarking their advance CD, Ba Da Bing was hoping not only that they would make recipients too paranoid to upload, but that the object itself would do the threatening. The physical advance, not the publicist or the label head, is now attempting to renegotiate the time-honored and rather informal promotional contract between company and writer. Such renegotiations can be aggressive, and such aggression destroys the aura of chumminess that rules between publicist and writer. One of the reasons I fucked up is that the Beirut advance did not clearly announce itself as being watermarked—my name was printed on the CD, which I didn't even notice, and there was no further warning.

This is in stark contrast to the data grenade I recently got from Warner Brothers: a CD advance of Mark Knopfler's shitty new record, Kill to Get Crimson. This object is a pure, time capsule-worthy artifact of the copyright anxieties of the early twenty-first century. The cardboard sleeve is yellow and black and emblazoned with an enormous exclamation point, and features the following threat:

RESTRICTED RELEASE! WATERMARKED DISC!
Do Not Copy – The Music on this CD Has Been Watermarked With a Unique Identifier that Allows Us to Identify the Intended Recipient (You) as the Source of Any Unauthorized Copies.

My favorite thing here is how the text creates an addressee through the bullying use of "us" and "you". The media organization announces that it is now an "us" acting like a data police force, and it then throws in the paranthetical second person "you" the way a cop shines a flashlight in your eyes. This "contract" creates a you that is already guilty. And you didn't even ask for this thing to show up at your door!

On the flip side of the CD, "you" also find the bullshit claim that by opening the package, you are agreeing to the fat paragraph of legalese plastered below. This language includes the hilarious proviso that the CD can only be listened to by the recipient—no girlfriends, no dogs, no neighbors. When you rip open the package, you discover that bad cop has been replaced with good cop by way of a final note: "Thank You for Agreeing to our Restricted Release Terms. Please Enjoy the Music!"

How is anyone supposed to enjoy music after such an Orwellian negotiation! It is as if, as the loss of the physical storage medium continues to undermine the economics of the record industry, the industry is using the object to fight back. It sends humble scribes packages that speak, that has powers of command, that can manipulate behavior and—if you dare to rip it open—even grant pleasure.

Moreover, the watermarked disc itself is, in some informational sense, alive, or at least virally infected with the digital ghost of my life. When I let that Beirut advance slip out of my hands, a little piece of me went with it, a chunk of virtual identity that I hadn't agreed for it to appropriate and that I didn't even know about. Instead of the old informal economy of circulating copies of music, I had become enmeshed in an emerging and far more claustrophobic world of endless virtual contracts and licenses, a world where objects command and the turn against you, where music has become data, and enjoyment little more than the processing thereof.

<<>>

hhhhhhhhhhhhhh

http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005348&src=article2_newsltr

go and look at the fancy graphs above.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Myth of the Active Music Buyer

SEPTEMBER 12, 2007

Blame product or pirates, but spending is down.

Who's to blame for falling music sales? Illegal music downloaders? Internet radio consumers? Britney Spears?

Regardless of the cause, the music industry has largely seen declining music sales as a crucible. The theory was that although fewer people bought music, the remaining buyers were true fans, and that digital downloads would eventually compensate for falling CD sales. But even though sales are still declining, the music super-consumer has yet to emerge, according to Bridge Ratings data.

"An interesting finding is the steep increase in the percentage of the population that bought music in 2006 compared with the previous year," said Paul Verna, eMarketer senior analyst.

Yet the average price per purchase is being reduced by the large numbers of consumers buying single MP3 downloads.

The 30% drop in compact disc sales from 2000 to 2005 was too steep to be offset by digital sales. The 16% drop in CD sales from 2005 to 2006 was partially offset by digital download sales growth.

The net effect is still a falling average price per music purchase, decreasing overall music revenues.

eMarketer interpolated the Bridge data with US Census Bureau population estimates dating back to 1980. While the total number of US music consumers has more than doubled to 96 million in 2006 from 45 million in 1980, annual per capita music expenditures have dropped drastically to $120 in 2006, from $198 in 1980.

"In other words," Mr. Verna said, "a lot more people may be buying music these days, but they're spending a whole lot less, on average, than they did at any point in the recent or more distant past."

Again, tabulating Bridge Ratings' percentages against Census Bureau statistics shows the track-driven download model pioneered by iTunes is broadening the universe of music consumers.

"That's good news for the industry," Mr. Verna said. "Even better news would be if today's consumers were spending at 1995 levels."

©2007 eMarketer Inc. All rights reserved

September 12, 2007

huh

http://www.grooveshark.com/blog/2007/09/12/how-sams-club-would-sell-music/

Music for the price of a text message.

That’s what Jerry Del Colliano, a professor of Music Industry at USC, thinks would save the music industry. Personally, I think he’s got a point. According to Colliano, texting is big business for mobile phone companies because the price is right. Because text messaging is so cheap, the youth market purchases them in bulk. Could this possibly be an answer to the music industry’s problems?

texting2.jpg

“The record industry — before it gets the lights on the way out the door — might want to consider making the purchase of music virtually non-consequential financially. Envision the youth market on their computers and cell phones buying — I said buying — music at will, on impulse, 24/7 — like they use text messaging. In bulk. So much for theft. So much for needing DRM. Sell volume and welcome to the new world of music. Several cents is next to nothing — just as it is for text messaging — but it adds up to big business. Between that and what they’d save on lawyers, it would be the 60’s all over again.”

I don’t know what the 60’s were like, but I can imagine the music industry was in much better shape than it is now. And at this point the music industry needs to take a look at any possible solution to its declining sales. I would imagine it would be extremely difficult to convince the record industry to drop the price of a song to the price of a text message, but imagine what that would do for music in general. For one, it would probably curb piracy, because if I won’t stop to pick up a penny off the ground, I’m probably not going to waste my time pirating a song just to save a couple cents. Not only that, but increased music sales would encourage record labels to explore more music in general because the overall demand for music would increase.

It sounded crazy to me at first, but I’m all for it. Music for the price of a text message.

****************************************************************************

interesting............ i can't be fussed to do the math at 5:30am (i am in vampire mode), but let me see.......

let's exclude videos, touring and tour support and all that. would complicate matters.

let's assume a song is sold for $0.25. a quarter. that's about 30 Yen. assume that an album production budget is going to be about $50,000 (dude, labour, studios, etc). divide that by 12 (per song), so that's $4,166, fuck that, make it a round $5,000. divide that by $0.25=20,000 sales.

hmm.......a $50,000 production budget is actually not that high, all those shiny shiny albums by major artists usually cost in the region of $150,000 to maybe even $300,000. right now, $5,000 would get you a "radio friendly" super duper mix engineer for a song, and that does not include studio time, which in those instances, would range from $1,000 to $3,000 (probably lower).

could work for a lot of independent acts though. hmm.........

September 1, 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/magazine/02rubin.t.html?ex=1346385600&en=13e3933c3b59c9dd&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/magazine/02rubin.t.html?ex=1346385600&en=13e3933c3b59c9dd&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

The Music Man
By LYNN HIRSCHBERG
Published: September 2, 2007

Rick Rubin is listening. A song by a new band called the Gossip is playing, and he is concentrating. He appears to be in a trance. His eyes are tightly closed and he is swaying back and forth to the beat, trying at once to hear what is right and wrong about the music. Rubin, who resembles a medium-size bear with a long, gray beard, is curled into the corner of a tufted velvet couch in the library of a house he owns but where he no longer lives. This three-story 1923 Spanish villa steeped in music history — Johnny Cash recorded in the basement studio; Jakob Dylan is recording a solo album there now — is used by Rubin for meetings. And ever since May, when he officially became co-head of Columbia Records, Rubin has been having nearly constant meetings. Beginning in 1984, when he started Def Jam Recordings, until his more recent occupation as a career-transforming, chart-topping, Grammy Award-winning producer for dozens of artists, as diverse as the Dixie Chicks, Slayer, Red Hot Chili Peppers and Neil Diamond, Rubin, who is 44, has never gone to an office of any kind. One of his conditions for taking the job at Sony, which owns Columbia, was that he wouldn't be required to have a desk or a phone in any of the corporate outposts. That wasn't a problem: Columbia didn't want Rubin to punch a clock. It wanted him to save the company. And just maybe the record business.

What that means, most of all, is that the company wants him to listen. It is Columbia's belief that Rubin will hear the answers in the music — that he will find the solution to its ever-increasing woes. The mighty music business is in free fall — it has lost control of radio; retail outlets like Tower Records have shut down; MTV rarely broadcasts music videos; and the once lucrative album market has been overshadowed by downloaded singles, which mainly benefits Apple. "The music business, as a whole, has lost its faith in content," David Geffen, the legendary music mogul, told me recently. "Only 10 years ago, companies wanted to make records, presumably good records, and see if they sold. But panic has set in, and now it's no longer about making music, it's all about how to sell music. And there's no clear answer about how to fix that problem. But I still believe that the top priority at any record company has to be coming up with great music. And for that reason, Sony was very smart to hire Rick."

Though Rubin maintains that his intention is simply to hear music with the fresh ears of a true fan, he has built his reputation on the simultaneously mystical and entirely decisive way he listens to a song. As the Gossip, which is fronted by a large, raucous woman named Beth Ditto, shouts to a stop, Rubin opens his eyes and nods yes. This is the first new band signed to Columbia that he has been enthralled by, but he is not yet sure how to organize the Gossip's future. "Let's hear something else," Rubin says to Kevin Kusatsu, who would, at any other record company, be called an A & R executive. (Traditionally, A & R executives spot, woo, recruit and oversee the talent of a record company.) "We don't have any titles at the new Columbia," Rubin explains, as Kusatsu, the first person Rubin hired, slips a disc out of its sleeve. "I don't want to create a new hierarchy to replace the old hierarchy."

Rubin, wearing his usual uniform of loose khaki pants and billowing white T-shirt, his sunglasses in his pocket, his feet bare, fingers a string of lapis lazuli Buddhist prayer beads, believed to bring wisdom to the wearer. Since Rubin's beard and hair nearly cover his face, his voice, which is soft and reassuring, becomes that much more vivid. He seems to be one with the room, which is lined in floor-to-ceiling books, most of which are of a spiritual nature, whether about Buddhism, the Bible or New Age quests for enlightenment. The library and the house are filled with religious iconography mixed with mementos from the world of pop. A massive brass Buddha is flanked by equally enormous speakers; vintage cardboard cutouts of John, Paul, George and Ringo circa "Help!" are placed around a multiarmed statue of Vishnu. On a low table, there are crystals and an old RadioShack cassette recorder that Rubin uses to listen to demo tapes; a framed photo of Jim Morrison stares at a crystal ball. In Rubin's world, music and spirituality collide.

"That's why they call him a guru," Natalie Maines, the lead singer of the Dixie Chicks, explained to me in August, calling from her home in Los Angeles. Maines, who has been with the label since 1997, first worked with Rubin in 2004. "At first, I didn't know if I was down with all that guru stuff. I thought, We're making a record — I don't want to be converted. But Rick's spirituality has mostly to do with his own sense of self. When it comes to the music, he's so sure of his opinion that you become sure of his opinion, too. And isn't that what gurus do? They know how to say the right things at the right time and get the best out of you."

Kusatsu, who has elaborate tattoos on both forearms and a match stuck behind his ear, puts the CD into Rubin's wireless system. This is the fourth male singer-songwriter with an acoustic guitar that Rubin has heard today. The music is heartfelt, spare, poetic. "There were a lot of girls in the audience," Kusatsu says as the track begins. Rubin closes his eyes and gently rocks back and forth. His hands are resting on his stomach, and he seems to be almost meditating. "Everything I do," Rubin told me earlier, "whether it's producing, or signing an artist, always starts with the songs. When I'm listening, I'm looking for a balance that you could see in anything. Whether it's a great painting or a building or a sunset. There's just a natural human element to a great song that feels immediately satisfying. I like the song to create a mood."

He also seeks a melody. As a kid growing up in Lido Beach, on New York's Long Island, Rubin loved the Beatles. "I never really liked the Stones," he said. "Although, I loved the Monkees — they had all the best songwriters." Through his passion for the Beatles, he became fascinated by the seductive, addictive power of songs. From the first hip-hop records he produced for L L Cool J and the Beastie Boys, he insisted on classic song structure. "Before Def Jam, hip-hop records were typically really long, and they rarely had a hook," he continued. "Those songs didn't deliver in the way the Beatles did. By making our rap records sound more like pop songs, we changed the form. And we sold a lot of records." The Beastie Boys' "Licensed to Ill" (released in 1986) went on to sell what was then an astonishing four million plus records; earlier that year, "Walk This Way," which combined Run-D.M.C. and Aerosmith, was the first crossover rap single and revitalized Aerosmith's career. Rubin masterminded both.

Whenever he agrees to produce an album, Rubin scrutinizes the songs before going into the studio. Currently, he is producing records for the hard rock band Metallica, the nerd power-pop band Weezer (it is part of his deal with Columbia that he can produce albums for acts that are not signed to the label) and the legendary Neil Diamond. At the moment, Metallica is touring in Europe, Weezer is writing a new batch of songs and Diamond has just started in the studio. Rubin works slowly — it can take him years to finish an album. "A lot of that is because of the songs," Rubin explained. "I try to get the artist to feel like they are writing songs for the ages rather than songs for an album. As they write, they come over and play the songs for me. For some reason, most people will write 10 songs and think, That's enough for a record, I'm done. When they play the songs for me, invariably the last two songs they've written are the best. I'll then say, 'You have two songs, go back and write eight more.' "

His responses are instant, specific and constructively definitive. "He doesn't even take notes," Maines recalled. "He listens with his eyes closed, presses 'pause' and then says, 'You need another chorus,' or 'There isn't enough of a bridge.' He's really precise, and you go back to work." In the early Metallica sessions, Rubin has been exacting about different drum sounds. "Lars" — Ulrich, the drummer — "will play two things for me, and I'll say, 'This one is great and that one is terrible,' " Rubin recalled. "Lars will say: 'How do you know? They both sound good to me.' Well, I just know. The right sound reaches its hand out and finds its way. So much of what I do is just being present and listening for that right sound."

Back in the library, the singer-songwriter's demo is ending. Rubin opens his eyes, blinks and says to Kusatsu: "We may have found one. Does he have any other songs I can hear?" While Kusatsu cues up the next sampling, Rubin texts an assistant on his BlackBerry. Within minutes, a chocolate protein drink is brought to him. As Rubin sips, he listens to the next track — a derivative, meandering song that drones like early Dylan without the lyric sophistication. With his eyes closed, Rubin begins to shake his head slowly. He looks disappointed. "And you wonder why people don't buy CDs anymore," Rubin says. "One song is great and the other is. . . . "

His voice trails off. As a producer or the head of a small independent label, Rubin could afford to be very particular. But Columbia, which is the home of established stars like Bruce, Beyoncé, Bob, Billy and Barbra, desperately needs a jolt of the new. It has also been years since Rubin worked with an artist who is not yet established. Since producing System of a Down in 1998, he has focused on reinvigorating the careers of Johnny Cash and producing records for well-known musicians like Tom Petty, U2 and Justin Timberlake. One of the biggest challenges of the Columbia job is to find unsigned artists and help chart their course.

"I don't know about this guy," Rubin says diplomatically. Kusatsu nods. "I don't want to make a decision for the wrong reason," Rubin continues. "The most important thing we have to do now is get the art right. So many of the decisions at these companies have not been about the music. They sign artists for the wrong reasons — because they think somebody else wants them or if they need to have a record out by a certain date. That old way of doing things is obsolete, but luckily, fear is making the record companies less arrogant. They're more open to ideas. So, what's important now is to find music that's timeless. I still believe that if an artist gains the belief of the listener, then anything is possible." Rubin pauses and looks at Kusatsu. "What else can I hear?" he asks.

This summer, Columbia Records began a program called Big Red. The company invited 20 college students from Harvard, Penn State and the University of Miami to work on various music projects. The interns concentrated mostly on the digital marketing and promotions departments in Columbia's offices in Midtown Manhattan, which are on Madison Avenue in a granite skyscraper designed by Philip Johnson.

At the end of their paid internships, the students took part in focus groups that were closely observed by Steve Barnett, Rubin's co-head at the label, and Mark DiDia, whom Rubin brought in as head of operations, as well as by other Columbia executives. The focus groups may have been the real point of Big Red — Barnett and the New York executives, especially those who had been at Sony for years, wanted to try to take the pulse of the elusive music audience. "The Big Red focus groups were both depressing and informative, and they confirmed what I — and Rick — already knew," DiDia told me afterward. "The kids all said that a) no one listens to the radio anymore, b) they mostly steal music, but they don't consider it stealing, and c) they get most of their music from iTunes on their iPod. They told us that MySpace is over, it's just not cool anymore; Facebook is still cool, but that might not last much longer; and the biggest thing in their life is word of mouth. That's how they hear about music, bands, everything."

Few of the kids knew that record companies participate only in the profits from records — that they derive no income from a band's merchandising or touring revenues. And they all thought that the Columbia logo stood for something prestigious, except in the hip-hop world. There it was deemed too commercial and corporate, but anywhere else it still represented a kind of impressive imprimatur. "Which was good news," DiDia continued. "It means we still have a brand that commands respect."

His insecurity on this point reflects the trepidation that is consuming the music business. Seemingly overnight, the entire industry is collapsing. Sales figures on top-selling CDs are about 30 percent lower than they were a year ago, and the usual remedies aren't available. Since radio is no longer a place to push a single, record companies have turned to television and movies. "High School Musical," which originated with a Disney Channel television show, was the top-selling album of 2006, and not only has "American Idol," with its 30-million-plus audience, created best-selling singers like Kelly Clarkson and Chris Daughtry, but an appearance on the show can also boost sales. When Jennifer Lopez performed on "American Idol," it was considered worth noting that her album "Como Ama Una Mujer," already out for four weeks, dipped only 7 percent rather than falling by the usual double digits. More impressively, songs that are heard on popular shows like "Grey's Anatomy" become instantly desirable. When the Columbia artist Brandi Carlile's song "The Story" was featured on the ABC show, it posted a 15 percent jump in sales and was downloaded 19,000 times in one week. Before being heard on the show, the song had been available for nearly two months without any notable interest.

"Until very recently," Rubin told me over lunch at Hugo's, a health-conscious restaurant in Hollywood, "there were a handful of channels in the music business that the gatekeepers controlled. They were radio, Tower Records, MTV, certain mainstream press like Rolling Stone. That's how people found out about new things. Every record company in the industry was built to work that model. There was a time when if you had something that wasn't so good, through muscle and lack of other choices, you could push that not very good product through those channels. And that's how the music business functioned for 50 years. Well, the world has changed. And the industry has not."

Steve Barnett, who is 55 and was the sole head of Columbia until he agreed to split his role with Rubin, was president of Epic Records, also a division of Sony, until 2005 and was well aware of the seismic shifts in the business. Barnett's corner office on the 25th floor of the Sony building is like a miniversion of the Hard Rock Cafe — autographed guitars belonging to Jeff Beck, Korn and Angus Young from AC/DC rest in their stands, and the walls are covered with vintage posters from the celebrated New York rock venue the Fillmore East. To the right of Barnett's large desk, above the framed Johnny Cash portrait, is a sign that reads, "Your Faith Needs to Be Greater Than Your Fear." "I have always believed that," Barnett told me in mid-August, "but it seems particularly relevant at the moment."

Barnett, who is English, is a sharp counterpoint to Rubin. He lives with his wife and two of their four sons in Connecticut. He has neatly parted sandy brown hair, and on the day we met, he was dressed in a blue button-down shirt, tan slacks and Gucci loafers with dark socks. Barnett is polite, careful, aware of his corporate status. Yet he supported recruiting Rubin. "My wife's father is Dick Vermeil, the former coach of the St. Louis Rams," Barnett explained. "My sons would go to training camp, and when Marshall Faulk started playing for the team, they called me and said, 'Not only is this guy a great player, he makes everyone around him better.' Of course, the Rams went on to win the Super Bowl. I think Rick Rubin is our Marshall Faulk. I knew he would change the culture here."

By the time Barnett first approached Rubin about coming to Columbia, Rubin had already decided that he would have nothing more to do with Columbia Records. This was because of the company's handling of the Rubin-produced Neil Diamond record "12 Songs" in 2005. Diamond was a hero of Rubin's, and he spent two years working on the album, persuading Diamond to record acoustically, something he hadn't done since the '60s.

"The CD debuted at No. 4," Rubin told me at Hugo's, still sounding upset. "It was the highest debut of Neil's career, off to a great start. But Columbia — it was some kind of corporate thing — had put spyware on the CD. That kept people from copying it, but it also somehow recorded information about whoever bought the record. The spyware became public knowledge, and people freaked out. There were some lawsuits filed, and the CD was recalled by Columbia. Literally pulled from stores. We came out on a Tuesday, by the following week the CD was not available. Columbia released it again in a month, but we never recovered. Neil was furious, and I vowed never to make another album with Columbia."

But when Barnett flew out to Los Angeles to discuss the job with Rubin, Rubin was intrigued. "I felt like I could be a force for good," he explained. "In the past, I've tried to protect artists from the label, and now my job would also be to protect the label from itself. So many of the decisions at these companies are not about the music. They are shortsighted and desperate. For so long, the record industry had control. But now that monopoly has ended, they don't know what to do. I thought it would be an interesting challenge."

As a kind of test, Rubin made some unusual demands. "Oh, God, I would have liked to have heard those negotiations," Natalie Maines exclaimed. "Rick knows what he's worth, and I can just hear him telling them, 'You might never see me, I may never wear shoes, you're not the boss of me.' And I'm sure they were saying, 'Whatever you want, Mr. Rubin.' I was surprised Sony made such a smart decision: someone who knows music should be running the company."

In addition to his "never wearing a suit, never traveling, never going to an office" demands, Rubin also suggested (strongly) that Columbia become the first major record company to go green and abolish plastic jewel boxes for all its CDs. "They thought about it and agreed," Rubin said. "And that made me think they would listen to me. It was also a turning point in terms of how big my reach could be. In the past, I would not normally have access to that kind of sweeping change. At Columbia, I'm able to operate on a much larger scale."

That was in late April. By August, Rubin still sounded optimistic, but a weariness had crept into his voice. "It's a big ship to turn around," he told me in the Hollywood Hills house. Simon and Garfunkel was playing in the background and Rubin was padding through the templelike rooms. "Columbia is stuck in the dark ages. I have great confidence that we will have the best record company in the industry, but the reality is, in today's world, we might have the best dinosaur. Until a new model is agreed upon and rolling, we can be the best at the existing paradigm, but until the paradigm shifts, it's going to be a declining business. This model is done."

While Columbia has made some small changes in its organizational structure, it has not instigated the kind of extensive alterations that Rubin says are crucial to the salvation of the business. Barnett is promoting the division at Columbia that sells music directly to TV, so that a network or cable show can introduce an artist to audiences the way radio once did. At Rubin's suggestion, he has also set up a "word of mouth" department, which will probably employ some members of the Big Red focus group along with dozens of other 20-somethings. The "word of mouth" department will function as a publicity-promotional arm of the company, spreading commissioned buzz through chat rooms across the planet and through old-fashioned human interaction. "They tell all their friends about a band," Barnett explained. "Their job is to create interest."

Rubin has a bigger idea. To combat the devastating impact of file sharing, he, like others in the music business (Doug Morris and Jimmy Iovine at Universal, for instance), says that the future of the industry is a subscription model, much like paid cable on a television set. "You would subscribe to music," Rubin explained, as he settled on the velvet couch in his library. "You'd pay, say, $19.95 a month, and the music will come anywhere you'd like. In this new world, there will be a virtual library that will be accessible from your car, from your cellphone, from your computer, from your television. Anywhere. The iPod will be obsolete, but there would be a Walkman-like device you could plug into speakers at home. You'll say, 'Today I want to listen to ... Simon and Garfunkel,' and there they are. The service can have demos, bootlegs, concerts, whatever context the artist wants to put out. And once that model is put into place, the industry will grow 10 times the size it is now."

From Napster to the iPod, the music business has been wrong about how much it can dictate to its audience. "Steve Jobs understood Napster better than the record business did," David Geffen told me. "IPods made it easy for people to share music, and Apple took a big percentage of the business that once belonged to the record companies. The subscription model is the only way to save the music business. If music is easily available at a price of five or six dollars a month, then nobody will steal it."

For this model to be effective, all the record companies will have to agree. "It's like getting the heads of the five families together," said Mark DiDia, referencing "The Godfather." "It will be very difficult, but what else are we going to do?"

Rubin sees no other solution. "Either all the record companies will get together or the industry will fall apart and someone like Microsoft will come in and buy one of the companies at wholesale and do what needs to be done," he said. "The future technology companies will either wait for the record companies to smarten up, or they'll let them sink until they can buy them for 10 cents on the dollar and own the whole thing."

Given the competition among record companies, the subscription model is bound to be tricky to organize and implement. One problem with iTunes is that, with some exceptions, all the songs are priced equally — a Justin Timberlake smash costs the same as an Al Jolson classic. Since a listener would, ideally, pay more for a Top 10 hit, that egalitarian system costs record companies potential millions of dollars. The opponents of the subscription model feel that making all music by all artists available for one flat fee will end up diminishing the overall revenue stream. They would also have to pool their talent, which is difficult for companies that have spent decades fighting over who signs with whom to accept. "There would have to be a new economic plan," Geffen explained. "And it would have to be equitable, depending on the popularity of the artists."

Steve Barnett is nervous about the subscription model. "Smart people have told me if the subscription model is not done correctly," he said, "it will be the final nail in our coffin. I've heard both sides of the argument, and I'm not convinced it's the solution to our problems. Rick wants to be a hero immediately. In his mind, you flick a switch and it's done. It doesn't work like that."

Barnett has other ideas, which he is discussing with Rubin. For instance, asking Columbia artists to give the record company up to 50 percent of their touring, merchandising and online revenue. This is unprecedented — even successful artists like the Dixie Chicks make a large percentage of their income from concerts and T-shirts. "Artists should never give that money up," Natalie Maines told me. "The companies are all scrambling because of the Internet, and they will screw the artist to meet their bottom line. I can't imagine Rick will go along with that."

Rubin won't say — he'd rather concentrate on honing the new model for the industry. "I don't want to waste time," he said, sounding a little frustrated. "The existing people will either get smart, which is a question mark. Or new people will understand what a resource the music business is and change it without us." Rubin paused. "I don't want to watch that happen."

One sunny day in June, Rick Rubin was trying to decide where the new Columbia Records headquarters in Los Angeles should be located. He may not want to go to an office himself, but he still recognizes the influence that a workplace can have on a staff. "I told the corporate Sony people that we have to get out of our old space in Los Angeles as quickly as possible," Rubin said as he disembarked from his Range Rover, which was parked outside a large, one-story former factory that now functions as a sound stage. "The Sony people thought I was insane. I'm also trying to get them to move out of their offices in New York. That space is tainted with the old way. And it's not an artist-friendly place — they search you when you walk in."

Rubin, who was wearing, as usual, khaki cargo pants and a white T-shirt, was trailed by two architects who had flown in from Manhattan for this meeting. He discovered these architects, Dominic Kozerski and Enrico Bonetti, when he saw a chair they designed in a magazine layout. Rubin loves research. He's always on a quest to find just the right thing, whether it be a book or a building. Recently, he hunted down the brand of water that claims to have the greatest level of purity (Ice Age); he pored over architectural manuals to determine what kind of hinge would have been used in 1923 (for his house); and when Johnny Cash was ailing, Rubin discovered a kinesiologist whom Cash credited with extending his life. And so on. Rubin has always been passionate, even compulsive, about his interests.

"From the time I was 9 years old, I loved magic," Rubin recalled as he walked around the cavernous loftlike space. "I was an only child, and I think that had a big impact on me. I always had grown-up friends even though I was a little kid. I would take the train from Lido Beach into Manhattan, and I'd hang out in magic shops. When I was 14, I had magician friends who were 60. I learned a lot from them — I still think about magic all the time. I always think about how things work, the mechanics of a situation — that's the nature of being a magician."

In high school, around 1980, Rubin started listening to a mix of heavy metal and punk rock. (He recalls buying the Germs' record "GI" and "Back in Black" by AC/DC on the same day.) "I saw the Ramones play every week," he said. "I was the only punk in my high school." Rubin paused. "I've always been an outsider. When I did magic, I was the only kid. When I worked with Johnny Cash, I was completely out of place in Nashville. And when I started Def Jam, I was the only white guy in the hip-hop world."

Although Rubin's parents — his father was a shoe wholesaler, and "my mother's job was me" — wanted him to be a lawyer, he had other ideas. In 1983, while he was attending N.Y.U., he borrowed $5,000 from his parents and recorded "It's Yours" by T La Rock and Jazzy Jay, a 12-inch single that became a local dance hit. Rubin then invented a label, calling his company Def Jam ("Def" meaning great, and "Jam" meaning music), and ran the business out of his dorm room. "The clerk at the front desk handled all the shipping," Rubin recalled.

Russell Simmons, who was then a hip-hop producer, loved "It's Yours" when he heard it on the radio. "I thought for sure that Rick was black," Simmons said. In 1984, a 16-year-old named L L Cool J (Ladies Love Cool James) sent a demo tape to Rubin's dorm room/Def Jam. "He was much better than anything else I heard," Rubin recalled. "And he still is. 'I Need a Beat,' L L's first single, was the real birth of Def Jam." Rubin did not release the track right away — he tightened up the structure, editing the rhymes so they more closely resembled verses in a song. The result is a spare, clean sound, rather than the endless repetitions of most early rap. "I thought the record would do well, and I asked Russell to be my partner at Def Jam. I did all the work from my dorm, and he did the promotion. Russell was five years older, and he was established. By myself, I was just a kid making records. He gave me credibility."

"I Need a Beat" sold 100,000 copies, and in the next year, Def Jam released seven more 12-inch records, selling a total of about 300,000 units. The major labels had ignored rap, dismissing it as a regional fad, but they took notice of Def Jam. CBS offered Rubin and Simmons $600,000 to pick four acts a year, a kind of finder's fee. "I was 20," Rubin said. "I sent a Xerox of the check to my parents. That's when this stopped being a hobby. At that point, I wanted to live the life of an artist."

By 1987, Rubin had already discovered the Beastie Boys, three upper-middle-class guys from New York City who could rap. The trio's anthemic hit, "(You Gotta) Fight for Your Right (to Party!)," which was produced by Rubin, was an instant classic: the rhythms of the words form a hook that circles and loops around your brain and will not leave. The Beasties' debut album, "Licensed to Ill," was the first rap album to go to No. 1 on the Billboard chart. "And we were still in the dorms," George Drakoulias, a successful producer who worked with Rubin for a decade, told me. "Rick didn't want to leave. He got college credits for running the record company. He stayed until he graduated. And by then, he and Russell were fighting over the direction of the company."

Each had a different idea of which bands Def Jam should produce. The partnership fell apart during renegotiations for their contract with CBS. Simmons wanted to get the biggest monetary advance possible from CBS, while Rubin wanted to bet on Def Jam, take a small amount of money for the sake of independence and make most of the cash on the back-end profits. They couldn't agree, and Def Jam was split in two, an arrangement that took nearly three years to finalize.

When things went sour, Rubin flew to Los Angeles to work on the soundtrack for the film "Less Than Zero." "I never really moved here," Rubin said now, still walking around the former factory space. "I never packed and moved. But I never left Los Angeles, even though I hadn't planned to stay." He lived in the Chateau Marmont for nine months and started a new record company, Def American. Rubin changed gears: he signed the hard rock bands Slayer and Danzig and gave a record deal to the misogynist comic Andrew Dice Clay. "At every stage of my career, there have always been people telling me not to do whatever it is that I'm doing," Rubin said. "After my initial success in rap, I started making rock records, and people said, 'Why would you do this?' I made a comedy album, and they said, 'Why this?' Now people ask me, 'Why do you want to do this Columbia job?' It's always the same answer: 'I've always liked doing the stuff that I like.' I just like good music or comedy or whatever it is, and now I have the chance to bring that to a big record company. I have no training, no technical skill — it's only this ability to listen and try to coach the artist to be the best they can from the perspective of a fan."

The architects were still daydreaming about where to put the lobby and the conference room in the factory-turned-soundstage when Rubin suggested that they drive over to another potential site for the new Columbia offices. They piled into his Range Rover, which was being driven by Nino Molina, one of his assistants. In the front seat, Rubin turned on the satellite radio and Sinatra's "Fly Me to the Moon" flooded the car. "Where we are going could not be more different than this spot," Rubin told the architects. "In a way, this factory is like a cool, old vintage Mustang convertible and the next building we're seeing is a Rolls-Royce. In the end, they are both great and they probably cost the same money, but they are completely opposite in style." Rubin fiddled with the radio. "Every Picture Tells a Story" by Rod Stewart replaced Sinatra. "They couldn't be more different, but both work," Rubin continued.

We drove east until we arrived at the former CAA building on Wilshire Boulevard in Beverly Hills. I. M. Pei designed this curvy, cream-colored travertine structure, and the most dominant feature of the space is its vast, soaring, three-story lobby. "This is a significant building," Rubin said. "How often do you get a chance to reinvent a landmark? Los Angeles doesn't have too many marquee buildings, and this is one of them."

The two spaces — one raw and full of promise and the other established and perfect for reinvention — are a neat metaphor for Rubin's divergent music tastes. "I've always been attracted to both new stuff and older stuff," he said as he opened the door to a plush screening room. "When I came to Los Angeles and started producing more, that became clearer to me."

At Def American, Rubin concentrated on a harder rock sound: Slayer's "Reign in Blood," which is considered to be a heavy metal classic, or the Geto Boys, whose rap song "Mind of a Lunatic" depicted vivid scenes of necrophilia and murder. "I just couldn't put out a record about sex with dead bodies and cutting off women's breasts," said David Geffen, whose company Geffen Records was the distributor of Def American. "I begged Rick not to put out the Geto Boys. In the end, I lost. He left and went to Warner Brothers."

Although Rubin claims that Geffen fired him, he stood by the Geto Boys: "I thought the art was good. As a fan, the Geto Boys were thrilling in the same way that a horror movie might be thrilling." In 1993, Rubin saw that the word "def" was now in dictionaries, and he decided to change the name of his company. Inspired by a documentary he'd seen about the hippie movement, Rubin held a formal funeral for Def. "When advertisers and the fashion world co-opted the image of hippies, a group of the original hippies in San Francisco literally buried the image of the hippie," Rubin explained. "When 'def' went from street lingo to mainstream, it defeated its purpose."

The funeral was lavish. The Rev. Al Sharpton was flown in from New York to deliver the eulogy, the Amazing Kreskin performed and Rubin purchased a cemetery plot and engraved headstone. The death of Def also marked a change in Rubin's career. He had never signed what he calls "grown-up artists," and he wanted to work with someone with enormous talent whose career had been eclipsed. "The first person I thought of was Johnny Cash," Rubin said now. "He was a little like this building — already a legend, but ripe for something different. I knew I could do something great with him."

In many ways, the Cash phase of Rubin's life, which lasted 10 years and produced five albums, has overshadowed all his other accomplishments. Rubin had worked intensively with artists before. When he produced the Red Hot Chili Peppers in 1991, he helped reinvent their sound by persuading them to incorporate melody and a more lyrical approach in their songwriting. The Chili Peppers defined their music narrowly — as rap infused with funk — and Rubin imagined a different quality. "My job was to break down those boundaries," he explained. "No band has to fit into a little box. I saw the Chili Peppers as being like the Beach Boys in some ways. They represented Los Angeles, a place of dreams." Anthony Kiedis, the lead singer, showed Rubin his notebooks, and the producer homed in on a poem about drugs and alienation called "Under the Bridge." He persuaded Kiedis to set the words to music, and the resulting song was a career-altering hit for the band.

Rubin installed the Peppers in a mansion in the Hollywood Hills that was rumored to be Harry Houdini's former home. It actually wasn't, but the house did have secret passageways, and the rumors of its history lingered. A studio was built, and the Peppers moved in with Rubin's personal chef at their service. As he always does when he produces a record, Rubin came and went. "I do not know how to work a board. I don't turn knobs. I have no technical ability whatsoever," he said. "But I'm there when they need me to be there. My primary asset is I know when I like something or not. It always comes down to taste. I'm not there to hold their hands and baby-sit, but I'm there for any key creative decisions."

And yet it was different with Cash. While Cash was an excellent songwriter, Rubin handpicked rock songs like "Hurt" by Nine Inch Nails, "Personal Jesus" by Depeche Mode and "Rusty Cage" by Soundgarden for Cash to reinterpret. (He also suggested "Addicted to Love" by Robert Palmer, but that didn't work.) He was much more involved with every aspect of the production — from the choice of songs to the arrangements to the videos — than he had been with any other artist. Rubin and Cash also had a deep spiritual kinship: during the final months of Cash's life, they took communion together every day, even though Rubin, who was born Jewish and now sees himself as not having any specific religious orientation, should not be eligible for the holy sacraments. Even after Cash's death, Rubin would close his eyes and hear Cash's voice as he said the benediction. "It was like hearing a song that you love," Rubin said. "He was there with me."

When Cash was in Los Angeles, he often stayed at Rubin's house. His bedroom, with its view of the city, was on the third floor, and Cash would take the elevator down to the recording studio in the basement. "I was always aware of how important Cash was," Rubin said. "But no one under 40 who didn't live in the South knew much about Johnny Cash besides a few hits and his name." What seems so clear now was not obvious when Rubin began working with Cash — it was risky to reinvent a living legend for a new generation.

After Cash's death, Rubin was searching for a challenge with an even higher degree of difficulty, a greater test for his powers of listening. The Columbia job is a different kind of reclamation project, but Rubin knows that, just possibly, he could restore an entire institution to greatness. "I can imagine people coming up with brilliant, creative ideas here," Rubin told the architects as they finished their tour of the building. "But Sony has to agree. I'm not sure they realize that they are selling art. Right now they could be selling any product. That's why we have to move — we're in the art business."

For the last two years, Rubin has lived in a house in Malibu that overlooks the ocean. In a way, this house is a return to his childhood in Lido Beach, where he spent his days near the water. "It's inspirational to live out here," Rubin said as he settled into a lounge chair with linen cushions facing the sea. "You feel the rhythm of the planet more keenly. I am never this aware of sunrise and sunset when I'm in town. The daily changes of nature at the beach can be deeply affecting."

Rubin has many of his business meetings here now. The '70s architecture of the house is nondescript, but the views from every room are spectacular. There's an old, elaborately carved grand piano in the living room alongside an enormous four-poster brass bed with a striking white linen canopy. When I arrived, Amanda Santos, Rubin's fiancée, was having a private yoga session. While we sat on the terrace, a small Yorkshire terrier named Henry ran between the living room and Rubin's lap. Despite a state-of-the-art sound system, there was no music playing. Only the sound of the waves.

All this Zen calm notwithstanding, Rubin, who was drinking ginger tea, was working. "Do you know about Paul Potts?" he asked as he went to the kitchen to get his laptop. "You have to see this. It totally blew my mind." Rubin found the proper link and turned the screen to face me. The clip was from a British show called "Britain's Got Talent," a version of "American Idol." Despite its popularity, Rubin has never seen "American Idol," and he had never heard of Simon Cowell, who is a judge on both programs.

"This is insane," Rubin said enthusiastically as the clip began. In the video, an ordinary-looking middle-aged man waited nervously backstage. When he faced the judges, he told them he worked at a mobile-phone store and wanted to sing opera. The studio audience looked annoyed — they clearly wanted to hear a pop song — and the judges were cold and dismissive. No one expected anything remarkable from this dull-looking, forgettable guy.

But then Paul Potts sang — "Nessun dorma" from "Turandot." He had an improbably beautiful voice. "Where does that come from?" Rubin said as he watched. Tears were rolling down his cheeks. "I can't look at this without crying," he said. "His voice is so beautiful." When Potts finished his song, Cowell said, "I thought you were absolutely fantastic." The studio audience roared with approval, and Potts beamed.

"It's August now — that show was eight weeks ago," Rubin said. "In England, Paul Potts is already gigantic, but we are going to launch him in America. This just blew my mind."

No one could have predicted that one of the first new Columbia artists to excite Rick Rubin would have been a would-be opera singer from a televised talent contest. "I certainly didn't expect his response to be so positive," said Steve Barnett, who originally brought Paul Potts to Rubin's attention. "I was surprised and pleased that he wanted to jump on it."

Rubin has an immediate plan for Potts — he wants to test the powers of his "word of mouth" department. "I want to see if we can create interest without there being a record to buy," he said. "I've told our whole staff to send it to everyone, to tell everyone, to mention it everywhere. I want to get Paul Potts out to the world." Rubin stopped for a moment. "Although, if someone tells you how great this is, it's not as moving. It's the element of surprise that makes you interested in Paul Potts: he looks so bland, and then he sings so well. If you expect him to be great, will the clip still be great?"

The question cannot be answered. A word-of-mouth campaign, like so many possible remedies for the ills of the record business, feels forced. "I just don't know how else people will see Paul Potts," Rubin said. "And I'm really glad I saw him." He paused and looked out at the surf. "I know this sounds hard to believe, but I never had any expectations of success," he said finally. "I knew what I liked, and I didn't really care if anyone else liked it. I still never assume that anyone will like anything. But I can't imagine that they won't, either."

"Sam Cooke built this," Neil Diamond said as he greeted Rubin at ArchAngel Studios in West Hollywood on a gray afternoon in late July. "I bought the place around 30 years ago. It's not open to the public, but I let Rick use it sometimes."

Rubin smiled. "I think the Doors made their first demo here," he said as he followed Diamond down the hall, past the walls of gold and platinum Neil Diamond records, past the framed album covers and into a glass recording studio. "And now, Neil."

For the past two weeks, Rubin and Diamond had been working on new material, and Diamond wanted Rubin to hear some songs that were near completion. "You know, initially I stalked Neil," Rubin said as an engineer prepared the first track. "Yes," said Diamond, who is trim and was wearing a suede baseball hat, dark shirt and jeans. "At first, it was a little scary — I didn't know what to make of it."

A classic Neil Diamond song about the renewing power of a relationship boomed from the speakers. Diamond looked down, a little self-conscious. Rubin, eyes closed, was seated at the engineer's console with his arms resting lightly on the mixing board. When the song ended, Rubin paused, opened his eyes and said: "You really caught a good mood on that. It lived for the first time." Diamond nodded. They discussed the merits of adding strings or changing the structure so that the bridge didn't sound so much like a chorus. "Some strings might inspire you," Rubin said. "And maybe some amplification near the end. It needs a little polish."

Diamond agreed, and four more tracks were played for Rubin's opinion. He was encouraging and specific — "a little percussion element could go here," he said. Or, "Let's shorten that rolling piano." After about an hour, Rubin hugged Diamond goodbye. They agreed to reconnect in a month, after he'd written some more songs. "I'll settle in without distraction," Diamond promised. "And then I'll be in touch."

Rubin headed back to his Range Rover. In the car, he said he had some live footage of the Gossip that he wanted to show me. "I saw the group at the Troubadour, and they blew my mind," he said. "It was the best show I've seen in five years. Afterward, I met with the band. They felt stressed, and they were having trouble writing songs. The energy in the room when they were performing was so intense, and I'm not even sure how we'd get it to feel like that in the studio. So we decided to record a live show during their European tour, and we're going to release a DVD of the live album as their first release."

Rubin looked pleased. Beth Ditto, the lead singer of the Gossip, is exactly what he has been looking for since he took this job at Columbia: she is an outsize personality in an outsize body with a Joplin-esque, bluesy voice. Ditto is the kind of artist Rubin loves — unique, ambitious and open to guidance. "For a band like the Gossip," Rubin continued, "the support of a record company like Columbia is still really important. I grew up in the independent music business, and you still really need the muscle of the majors. A record company call can still get you heard like nobody else."

Rubin paused. "That's the magic of the business," he said. "It's all doom and gloom, but then you go to a Gossip show or hear Neil in the studio and you remember that too many people make and love music for it to ever die. It will never be over. The music will outlast us all."

Lynn Hirschberg, editor at large for the magazine, writes regularly about the entertainment industry.
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company